22.03.2013 Views

LOOKING UNTO JESUS OR CHRIST IN TYPE AND ANTITYPE. BY ...

LOOKING UNTO JESUS OR CHRIST IN TYPE AND ANTITYPE. BY ...

LOOKING UNTO JESUS OR CHRIST IN TYPE AND ANTITYPE. BY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

essential that such decree should be put in writing, and<br />

signed by the king. Nehemiah had nothing of the kind. His<br />

commission was only verbal. If it be said that the letters<br />

granted him constituted a decree, then the decree was issued,<br />

not to Nehemiah, but to the "governors beyond the<br />

river;" and, moreover, these would constitute a plurality<br />

of decrees, not one decree, as the prophecy contemplates.<br />

p. 179, Para. 1, [<strong>LOOK<strong>IN</strong>G</strong>].<br />

2. The occasion of Nehemiah's petition to the king for<br />

permission to go up to Jerusalem was the report which certain<br />

ones, returning had brought from thence, that those in<br />

the province were in great affliction and reproach; that<br />

the wall of Jerusalem also was broken down, and the gates<br />

thereof burned with fire. Nehemiah 1. What wall and gates<br />

were those that were broken down and burned with fire? --<br />

Evidently some which had been built by the Jews who had returned<br />

to Jerusalem under one, or all, of the preceding decrees,<br />

of Cyrus, Darius and Artaxerxes; for it cannot for a<br />

moment be supposed that the utter destruction of the city<br />

by Nebuchadnezzar, one hundred and forty-four years previous<br />

to that time, would have been reported to Nehemiah as a<br />

matter of news, or that he would have considered it, as he<br />

evidently did, a fresh misfortune, calling for a fresh expression<br />

of his grief. A decree, therefore, authorizing the<br />

building of these, had gone forth previous to the grant to<br />

Nehemiah. p. 179, Para. 2, [<strong>LOOK<strong>IN</strong>G</strong>].<br />

3. Should any contend that the commission to Nehemiah must<br />

be the decree in question, because the object of his request<br />

was that he might build the city, it is sufficient to<br />

reply as above, that gates and walls had been built previous<br />

to his going up; besides, the work of building which he<br />

went to perform was accomplished in fifty-two days; whereas<br />

the prophecy allows for the building of the city, seven<br />

weeks, or forty-nine years. p. 179, Para. 3, [<strong>LOOK<strong>IN</strong>G</strong>].<br />

4. There was nothing granted to Nehemiah not embraced in<br />

preceding decrees, while those decrees had already granted<br />

vastly more privileges than his commission. p. 180, Para.<br />

1, [<strong>LOOK<strong>IN</strong>G</strong>].<br />

5. Reckoning from the commission to Nehemiah, B.C. 444,<br />

the dates throughout are entirely disarranged; for from<br />

that point the troublous times which were to attend the<br />

building of the street and wall did not last seven weeks,<br />

or forty-nine years. Reckoning from that date, the sixty-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!