22.03.2013 Views

LOOKING UNTO JESUS OR CHRIST IN TYPE AND ANTITYPE. BY ...

LOOKING UNTO JESUS OR CHRIST IN TYPE AND ANTITYPE. BY ...

LOOKING UNTO JESUS OR CHRIST IN TYPE AND ANTITYPE. BY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

this dispensation, has reference to that which is the sanctuary<br />

of this dispensation; namely, the sanctuary in<br />

heaven. But as we have shown, the 2300 days reach far down<br />

into this dispensation; and consequently the sanctuary to<br />

be cleansed at the end of those days is the sanctuary of<br />

this dispensation, not the sanctuary in old Jerusalem,<br />

which has been superseded, and has "vanished away," but the<br />

tabernacle of God, on high. p. 209, Para. 2, [<strong>LOOK<strong>IN</strong>G</strong>].<br />

This is illustrated by what is said of the host. By the<br />

word "host," of course, is meant the people of God. The<br />

host was to be trodden underfoot the whole length of time<br />

covered by the vision. Who were the host, the people of<br />

God, when Daniel wrote? -- They were the Jews. But the vision<br />

reaches over into this dispensation; and who are the<br />

host, the people of God, now? The Jews? -- No; but Christians,<br />

who are called in by the gospel. When the dispensation<br />

changed, the Jews were no longer recognized as the<br />

"host," but Christians are now such, and to them Dan. 8:13<br />

now applies. So, likewise, when the new covenant was introduced,<br />

the sanctuary of the vanished dispensation was no<br />

longer recognized as the sanctuary of the Bible, but the<br />

true sanctuary in heaven, which then took its place, became<br />

the sanctuary of the Bible; and to this, Dan. 8:14 now applies.<br />

p. 210, Para. 1, [<strong>LOOK<strong>IN</strong>G</strong>].<br />

To return to the illustration proposed above as an objection:<br />

If it were arranged that a meeting-house in Detroit<br />

should be the meeting-house of a certain society for ten<br />

years, and then it should be destroyed, and give place to a<br />

meeting-house in Chicago which should thenceforward for<br />

twenty years be the meeting-house of that same society, and<br />

then it was promised that at the end of thirty years the<br />

meeting-house of that society should be cleansed, to which<br />

would it apply? To the meeting-house in Detroit, which had<br />

been destroyed? or to the meeting-house in Chicago, which<br />

was the meeting-house of the society at that time? -- To<br />

the one in Chicago, of course. This would be an illustration<br />

adapted to the subject of the sanctuary; for this is<br />

just what the Bible asserts in relation to it. It said that<br />

while the former dispensation lasted, the earthly sanctuary<br />

should be the sanctuary connected with God's worship; that<br />

then that sanctuary should be destroyed and give place to<br />

the true tabernacle and sanctuary in heaven, which the Lord<br />

pitched, and not man, which should thenceforward be the<br />

sanctuary of God's worship and of this dispensation; and<br />

finally, that at the end of 2300 days, which would bring us

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!