Continuous Improvement and the Expansion of Quality ... - NCQA
Continuous Improvement and the Expansion of Quality ... - NCQA
Continuous Improvement and the Expansion of Quality ... - NCQA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
W E l l N E S S A N D P R E V E N T I o N<br />
44<br />
In 2010 an estimated 142,570 men <strong>and</strong> women were diagnosed with colon cancer, <strong>and</strong><br />
approximately 51,370 died from <strong>the</strong> disease, making it <strong>the</strong> second leading cause <strong>of</strong> cancer<br />
death in <strong>the</strong> United States. 1,2 The Colorectal Cancer Screening measure assesses whe<strong>the</strong>r adults<br />
50–75 years <strong>of</strong> age received screening for colorectal cancer, based on <strong>the</strong> recommendation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> U.S. Preventive Services Task force. 3<br />
• Symptoms are not common in colorectal<br />
cancer until <strong>the</strong> disease has progressed<br />
<strong>and</strong> chances <strong>of</strong> survival have decreased. 4<br />
Treatment in <strong>the</strong> disease’s earliest stage is<br />
highly successful, with a five-year survival<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> 74 percent. 5<br />
• Most colorectal cancers occur in people<br />
without a family history <strong>of</strong> colorectal<br />
cancer. 6 While screening is extremely<br />
effective in detecting colorectal cancer, it<br />
remains underutilized.<br />
<strong>the</strong> Case for <strong>Improvement</strong><br />
• Approximately half <strong>of</strong> American adults do<br />
not receive <strong>the</strong> necessary colorectal cancer<br />
screening. 7 Screening rates for colorectal<br />
cancer lag behind o<strong>the</strong>r cancer screening<br />
rates. 8<br />
• fecal occult blood tests, colonoscopy <strong>and</strong><br />
flexible sigmoidoscopy are shown to be<br />
effective screening methods. 6 Colorectal<br />
screen <strong>of</strong> individuals with no symptoms<br />
can identify polyps whose removal can<br />
prevent more than 90 percent <strong>of</strong> colorectal<br />
cancers. 9<br />
N AT I o N A l C o M M I T T E E f o R Q U A l I T y A S S U R A N C E<br />
ColoRECTAl CANCER SCREENING<br />
• Deaths associated with colorectal cancer<br />
declined in 2010, continuing a 15-year<br />
trend attributed to increased screening<br />
<strong>and</strong> early detection. 3,10 between 2003<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2007, 35 states saw decreases in <strong>the</strong><br />
number <strong>of</strong> new cases <strong>of</strong> colorectal cancer, 11<br />
but regional variation exists.<br />
• Screening for colorectal cancer is shown<br />
to be cost effective for <strong>the</strong> health care<br />
system. The cost <strong>of</strong> screening far outweighs<br />
<strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> treating more progressive<br />
colorectal cancer. 12<br />
• Doctors’ recommendations have been<br />
found to be a major predictor <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />
patients receive <strong>the</strong> supported screening. 13<br />
HEdIs Measure definition<br />
The percentage <strong>of</strong> adults 50–75 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
who had appropriate screening for colorectal<br />
cancer with any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following tests: fecal<br />
occult blood test during <strong>the</strong> measurement<br />
year; flexible sigmoidoscopy during <strong>the</strong><br />
measurement year or <strong>the</strong> four years prior to<br />
<strong>the</strong> measurement year; or colonoscopy during