Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International

-5-
2.2.2 Fuselage width
2.2.2.1 The fuselage width will influence the aerodrome category for RFF. Maximum fuselage width
of the most critical aeroplane is one of the two Annex 14 criteria to determine aerodrome category for RFF.
2.2.3.1 The fuselage height may influence:
2.2.3 Fuselage height
a) Location of holding position: Fuselage height is one of the Annex 14 criteria used to
determine the location of the runway holding position (including tail height and distance
from the nose to the highest part of the tail) of the critical aeroplane which shall be clear
of the runway obstacle free zone (OFZ);
b) passenger gate and terminal area, in terms of upper deck access; and
c) dimensions of aircraft maintenance facilities.
2.2.4.1 The tail height may influence:
2.2.4 Tail height
a) location of holding position (see 2.2.3 above);
b) ILS sensitive areas: in addition to the tail height of the critical aircraft, tail composition,
tail position and obstacle density (but also fuselage height and length) should be taken
into account to determine the effect on ILS sensitive areas;
c) dimensions of aircraft maintenance services;
d) de-icing/anti-icing facilities; and
e) aeroplane parking position (in relation to aerodrome obstacle limitation surfaces).
2.2.5.1 The wing span would influence:
2.2.5 Wing span
a) taxiway separation distances (including runway-taxiway separation distances);
b) dimensions of the obstacle free zone (OFZ);
c) location of runway holding position (due to the impact of wing span on OFZ
dimensions);
d) dimensions of aprons and holding bays;
e) shoulder dimensions;
<strong>ICAO</strong> Version 4.1 — 15 March 2004