25.03.2013 Views

Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International

Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International

Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-27-<br />

<strong>NLA</strong>. If inadequate, suitable strengthening measures, if ec<strong>on</strong>omical and technically feasible, would need to<br />

be implemented. Otherwise, alternate taxi routes should be established that would have suitably designed<br />

underground structures where needed.<br />

4.1.5.3.7 Possible mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures for operati<strong>on</strong> of a given <strong>NLA</strong> <strong>on</strong> taxiway bridges which do not<br />

meet Annex 14, Volume I, code F specificati<strong>on</strong>s are:<br />

a) where feasible, strengthen existing bridges;<br />

b) provide a proven method of lateral restraint to prevent the aeroplane from veering off<br />

the full bearing strength of the taxiway bridge; and<br />

c) alternative path/bridge for RFF vehicles subject to its feasibility from an RFF point of<br />

view.<br />

4.1.6 Taxiway minimum separati<strong>on</strong> distances<br />

4.1.6.1 Runway to parallel taxiway separati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

4.1.6.1.1 Annex 14, Volume I, paragraph 3.8.7, Table 3-1, columns 5 and 9 specify, for code F, a<br />

minimum distance between the centre lines of a runway and the associated parallel taxiway of 190 m for<br />

instrument runways and 115 m for n<strong>on</strong>-instrument runways. It may be permissible to operate with lower<br />

separati<strong>on</strong> distances at an existing aerodrome if an aer<strong>on</strong>autical study indicates that such lower separati<strong>on</strong><br />

distances would not adversely affect the safety or significantly effect the regularity of operati<strong>on</strong>s of<br />

aeroplanes. See Note 2 to Table 3-1, and Notes 2, 3 and 4 to paragraph 3.8.7 of Annex14, Volume I.<br />

4.1.6.1.2 Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2: paragraph 1.2.19, Table 1-5 clarifies that the<br />

runway/taxiway separati<strong>on</strong> is based <strong>on</strong> the principle that the wing tip of an aeroplane taxiing <strong>on</strong> a parallel<br />

taxiway should be clear of the runway strip.<br />

The runway to taxiway separati<strong>on</strong> distance = 1/2 wing span + 1/2 strip width.<br />

For code E: 1/2 x 65 m + 1/2 x 300 m = 182.5 m<br />

For code F: 1/2 x 80 m + 1/2 x 300 m = 190 m<br />

4.1.6.1.3 Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2 has related guidance in paragraph 1.2.46 to 1.2.49.<br />

Furthermore, attenti<strong>on</strong> is drawn to the need to provide adequate clearance at an existing airport in order to<br />

operate a new larger aeroplane with the minimum possible risk.<br />

4.1.6.2 Hazard identificati<strong>on</strong> and analysis<br />

4.1.6.2.1 The potential hazards associated with runway and parallel taxiway separati<strong>on</strong> distances are:<br />

a) collisi<strong>on</strong> risk between an aeroplane in flight and an object (fixed or mobile) <strong>on</strong> the<br />

aerodrome;<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>ICAO</str<strong>on</strong>g> Versi<strong>on</strong> 4.1 — 15 March 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!