25.03.2013 Views

Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International

Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International

Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-31-<br />

4.1.6.7.2 A review of comm<strong>on</strong>ly used databases reveals that informati<strong>on</strong> relative to collisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />

taxiing is limited as few such incidents have been recorded as serious incidents. However, the causes of such<br />

an event could be classified as:<br />

a) mechanical failure (hydraulic system, brake, nose gear steering);<br />

b) surface c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (standing water, loss of c<strong>on</strong>trol <strong>on</strong> ice-covered surface, fricti<strong>on</strong><br />

coefficient);<br />

c) loss of visual taxiway guidance system (markings and lights covered by snow); and<br />

d) human factors (directi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>trol, temporary loss of orientati<strong>on</strong>, etc.).<br />

4.1.6.7.3 C<strong>on</strong>sequences of collisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> taxiing are potentially major.<br />

4.1.6.8 Risk assessment and possible mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures<br />

4.1.6.8.1 Operati<strong>on</strong>al experience of existing code E aeroplanes, under favourable c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, shows<br />

that deviati<strong>on</strong>s do not increase with aeroplane size. It is therefore expected that taxiway deviati<strong>on</strong>s by <strong>NLA</strong><br />

will not be significantly different from code E aeroplanes. This has yet to be c<strong>on</strong>firmed by actual operati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

experience with <strong>NLA</strong>s. That is why the permissible deviati<strong>on</strong> of code F aeroplanes in Annex 14, Volume I,<br />

paragraph 3.8.3 is the same as for code E aeroplanes.<br />

4.1.6.8.2 Taxiway deviati<strong>on</strong> statistics may be used to assess the collisi<strong>on</strong> risk between two aircraft or<br />

between an aircraft and an object. Several taxiway deviati<strong>on</strong> studies are available or in progress <strong>on</strong> different<br />

aerodromes world-wide (JFK, ANC, AMS, LHR, CDG, FRA & SYD. Final reports are expected in 2004).<br />

4.1.6.8.3 Possible mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures for operati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>NLA</strong> <strong>on</strong> taxiways which do not meet the<br />

taxiway minimum separati<strong>on</strong> distances specified in Annex 14, Volume I, Table 3-1 for code F are:<br />

a) reduced taxiing speed;<br />

b) provisi<strong>on</strong> of taxiway centre line lights;<br />

c) provisi<strong>on</strong> of taxi side stripe markings (and taxiway edge lights);<br />

d) special taxi routing for new larger aeroplanes;<br />

e) restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> aircraft (wing span) allowed to use parallel taxiways during <strong>NLA</strong><br />

operati<strong>on</strong>s;<br />

f) restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> vehicles using service roads adjacent to a designated new larger<br />

aeroplane route;<br />

g) use of “follow me” guidance; and<br />

h) reduced spacing between taxiway centre line lights.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>ICAO</str<strong>on</strong>g> Versi<strong>on</strong> 4.1 — 15 March 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!