Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International
Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International
Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
-31-<br />
4.1.6.7.2 A review of comm<strong>on</strong>ly used databases reveals that informati<strong>on</strong> relative to collisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />
taxiing is limited as few such incidents have been recorded as serious incidents. However, the causes of such<br />
an event could be classified as:<br />
a) mechanical failure (hydraulic system, brake, nose gear steering);<br />
b) surface c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (standing water, loss of c<strong>on</strong>trol <strong>on</strong> ice-covered surface, fricti<strong>on</strong><br />
coefficient);<br />
c) loss of visual taxiway guidance system (markings and lights covered by snow); and<br />
d) human factors (directi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>trol, temporary loss of orientati<strong>on</strong>, etc.).<br />
4.1.6.7.3 C<strong>on</strong>sequences of collisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> taxiing are potentially major.<br />
4.1.6.8 Risk assessment and possible mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures<br />
4.1.6.8.1 Operati<strong>on</strong>al experience of existing code E aeroplanes, under favourable c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, shows<br />
that deviati<strong>on</strong>s do not increase with aeroplane size. It is therefore expected that taxiway deviati<strong>on</strong>s by <strong>NLA</strong><br />
will not be significantly different from code E aeroplanes. This has yet to be c<strong>on</strong>firmed by actual operati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
experience with <strong>NLA</strong>s. That is why the permissible deviati<strong>on</strong> of code F aeroplanes in Annex 14, Volume I,<br />
paragraph 3.8.3 is the same as for code E aeroplanes.<br />
4.1.6.8.2 Taxiway deviati<strong>on</strong> statistics may be used to assess the collisi<strong>on</strong> risk between two aircraft or<br />
between an aircraft and an object. Several taxiway deviati<strong>on</strong> studies are available or in progress <strong>on</strong> different<br />
aerodromes world-wide (JFK, ANC, AMS, LHR, CDG, FRA & SYD. Final reports are expected in 2004).<br />
4.1.6.8.3 Possible mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures for operati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>NLA</strong> <strong>on</strong> taxiways which do not meet the<br />
taxiway minimum separati<strong>on</strong> distances specified in Annex 14, Volume I, Table 3-1 for code F are:<br />
a) reduced taxiing speed;<br />
b) provisi<strong>on</strong> of taxiway centre line lights;<br />
c) provisi<strong>on</strong> of taxi side stripe markings (and taxiway edge lights);<br />
d) special taxi routing for new larger aeroplanes;<br />
e) restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> aircraft (wing span) allowed to use parallel taxiways during <strong>NLA</strong><br />
operati<strong>on</strong>s;<br />
f) restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> vehicles using service roads adjacent to a designated new larger<br />
aeroplane route;<br />
g) use of “follow me” guidance; and<br />
h) reduced spacing between taxiway centre line lights.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>ICAO</str<strong>on</strong>g> Versi<strong>on</strong> 4.1 — 15 March 2004