Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International
Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International
Draft ICAO Circular on NLA.pdf - Airports Council International
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>ICAO</str<strong>on</strong>g> Versi<strong>on</strong> 4.1 — 15 March 2004<br />
-16-<br />
c) Risk assessment and possible mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures related to the specific infrastructure<br />
item are given as a guideline. Informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> risk assessment methods is c<strong>on</strong>tained in<br />
paragraph 3.4.2 of this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Circular</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />
4.1.1.4 A reference list of studies is provided in Appendix B. Subject to cauti<strong>on</strong>s and guidance<br />
elsewhere in this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Circular</str<strong>on</strong>g>, these studies and results may assist authorities in developing their aer<strong>on</strong>autical<br />
studies. Inclusi<strong>on</strong> of references in this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Circular</str<strong>on</strong>g> to studies c<strong>on</strong>ducted outside of <str<strong>on</strong>g>ICAO</str<strong>on</strong>g> does not imply <str<strong>on</strong>g>ICAO</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
endorsement. They are provided solely for the informati<strong>on</strong> of the reader. Any applicati<strong>on</strong> of the results of<br />
the studies listed in the references to any <strong>on</strong>going studies remains a matter for decisi<strong>on</strong> by the appropriate<br />
authorities.<br />
4.1.2 Runway and shoulders<br />
4.1.2.1 Runway width<br />
4.1.2.1.1 Annex 14, Volume I, paragraph 3.1.9 recommends that the width of a runway should not be<br />
less than 45 m where the code letter is E, and 60 m where the code letter is F.<br />
4.1.2.1.2 Guidance in the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 1, Runways, indicates that,<br />
primarily the runway width is related to the outer main gear wheel span and the clearance required <strong>on</strong> either<br />
side of the outer main gear wheels when the aeroplane is centred <strong>on</strong> the runway centre line, as shown in the<br />
following formula:<br />
Runway width = TM+2 x C<br />
where TM = outer main gear wheel span and C= clearance between the outer main gear wheel and the<br />
runway edge.<br />
The guidance in Doc 9157, Part 1 states that other factors of operati<strong>on</strong>al significance indicate that it might<br />
be advisable, for planning purposes, to c<strong>on</strong>sider a width of up to 60 m. The rati<strong>on</strong>ale for this was to have a<br />
margin for factors such as wet or c<strong>on</strong>taminated runway pavement, cross wind c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, crab angle<br />
approaches to landing and aircraft c<strong>on</strong>trollability during aborted take-off.<br />
4.1.2.2 Hazard identificati<strong>on</strong> and analysis<br />
4.1.2.2.1 The main hazard linked to available runway width is from structural damage associated with<br />
an aircraft running off the runway, during take-off, rejected take-off, or landing phase.<br />
4.1.2.2.2 The main causes and accident factors are:<br />
a) for take-off:<br />
1) Aircraft (asymmetric spin-up and/or reverse thrust, malfuncti<strong>on</strong>ing of c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />
surfaces, hydraulic system, tires, brakes, nose gear steering, aft CG);<br />
2) Power plant (engine failure, foreign object ingesti<strong>on</strong>);<br />
3) Surface c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (standing water, snow, runway fricti<strong>on</strong> coefficient);