26.03.2013 Views

TEXTURAL AND MICROANALYSIS OF IGNEOUS ROCKS: TOOLS ...

TEXTURAL AND MICROANALYSIS OF IGNEOUS ROCKS: TOOLS ...

TEXTURAL AND MICROANALYSIS OF IGNEOUS ROCKS: TOOLS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4.6.1 Partition coefficients for DSM plagioclase crystals<br />

I used equation 3.2 and the parameterizations of Blundy and Wood [11, 12] to<br />

calculate D values for Sr, Y, Ba, La, Ce, Nd, and Sm. (see Table 3.4). I assumed<br />

a crystallization temperature of 1190 ◦ C to calculate D values. The validity of<br />

this assumption was examined using the MELTS program [2, 55] to determine<br />

the temperature at which plagioclase arrives on the liquidus during crystallization<br />

of a typical Detroit Seamount tholeiitic basalt. I input Detroit Seamount tholei-<br />

itic basaltic glass compositions reported by Huang et al. [72] into the MELTS<br />

program. During equilibrium crystallization of the lowest MgO glass from Site<br />

1203 (Unit 3), plagioclase appeared on the liquidus at 1170 ◦ C, at at 1190 ◦ C from<br />

the highest MgO glass from Site 1203 (top of Unit 18), and at 1200 ◦ C from the<br />

highest MgO glass from Site 884 (Unit 10). The use of 1170 ◦ C vs. 1200 ◦ C in D<br />

calculations yields < 4% differences in trace element concentrations of parent liq-<br />

uids, which is within the analytical error for my analyses. The effects of pressure<br />

on plagioclase D values are not well documented for most elements, and where<br />

they were documented for DSr by Vander Auwera et al. [137] they were negligible.<br />

I used a crystallization pressure of 0.001 kbar for D calculations. I assume the<br />

strain compensated (i.e., strain free) partition coefficient D 2+<br />

0 in plagioclase is best<br />

approximated by DCa (c.f., [12]), and to estimate DCa I used equation 3.1 and the<br />

“a” and “b” constants reported for Ca by Bindeman et al. [7]. Estimation of D 3+<br />

0<br />

is less straightforward. I assumed D 3+<br />

0 to be ∼ 7.5% of D 2+<br />

0 , which was derived<br />

from experimental data reported in Blundy [9]. I used equation 3.1 and the “a”<br />

and “b” constants reported for Ti by Bindeman et al. [7] to estimate DTi<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!