03.04.2013 Views

To download as PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to enemy movement or maneuver, General Hobbs<br />

had always to watch for local counterattacks on<br />

that side of the ridge. The 30th Division w<strong>as</strong> still<br />

in a salient, with up to two miles of exposed flank<br />

On either side.<br />

At '300 on ,6 Jul y, Combat Command B w<strong>as</strong><br />

relieved from attachment to the 30th Division and<br />

reverted to the 3d Armored Division. During its<br />

fighting in the sector west of the Vire the combat<br />

command had received '3' c<strong>as</strong>ualties and lost<br />

24 tanks to enemy fire, main I y by bazook<strong>as</strong>. The<br />

armored units had done hard fighting and were<br />

sorely in need of rest, repair, and maintenance.<br />

Beside lending active support to the 30th Division<br />

units, Combat Command B had captured and held<br />

the vital ground at Hauts-Vents since II July.<br />

From '7 to '9 July, the 30th Division rounded<br />

out its gains down the ridge. (See Map '9.) An<br />

attack by the I20th Infantry on '7 July still met<br />

heavy opposition, but got <strong>as</strong> far <strong>as</strong> la Houcharderie.<br />

Two enemy counterattacks were repulsed,<br />

after infiltrating some distance into the 120th's<br />

lines. The II7th w<strong>as</strong> ordered to reach the Terrette<br />

bridges near la Huberderie in order to help<br />

the 9th Division. Colonel Kelly put the 2d Battalion<br />

on this job, but they found it very difficult<br />

to advance down the ridge slope under accurate<br />

observed fire from high ground on the other side<br />

of the stream. At night they were still 400 yards<br />

from the objective, which w<strong>as</strong> taken next day.<br />

Preparations were made on ,8 July for a l<strong>as</strong>t<br />

push down the ridge. The II9th Infantry w<strong>as</strong><br />

brought into line on the left of the '20th. Next<br />

day, the two regiments attacked on a three battalion<br />

front; enemy resistance w<strong>as</strong> light, and the<br />

30th Division organized an MLR in positions from<br />

which it could interdict the St-L6-Periers highway<br />

by rifle fire. It w<strong>as</strong> on its objective.<br />

On the right flank of the 30th Division, the 9th<br />

had come up abre<strong>as</strong>t in hard fighting along a<br />

broad front. By,S June, the 9th had cleaned out<br />

the German strongpoints e<strong>as</strong>t of the Taute and<br />

gained the crossroads at les Champs-de-Losque.<br />

But just south of that village, the 9th struck the<br />

enemy's new MLR, defending the higher ground<br />

nsmg toward the Periers-St-Lo highway. For<br />

the next two days of very severe effort, net gains<br />

were negligible. Finally, on '7-,8 July, the 39th<br />

Infantry broke through; during these two days<br />

the 9th Division pushed to within a few hundred<br />

yards of the St-Lo highway, and crossed it with<br />

patrols. The 9th and the 30th together had<br />

gained the ground which First <strong>Army</strong> proposed to<br />

use for its jump-off in the breakthrough operation,<br />

COBRA.<br />

30th Division intelligence estimates placed German<br />

strength on the division front, <strong>as</strong> of 20 July,<br />

at about 2,000 men. These included battered units<br />

belonging to Panzer Lehr, I#h Parachute Regiment,<br />

and the 275th Division.<br />

The Germall Seventh <strong>Army</strong> found it necessary<br />

011 [5 July to commit a battalion of the recently<br />

arrived [#h Parachute Regiment (5th Parachute<br />

Division) to help Panzer I.ehr check the American<br />

advance west of Pam-Hebert. Panzer Lehr<br />

reported its resources were not able to ({stem tlze<br />

enemy onslaught," and still ·another battalion of<br />

the 5th Parachute Division had to be commiued.<br />

Seventh <strong>Army</strong> registered its disappoimment over<br />

the necessity of throwing in new units, immediately<br />

on their arrival, thus using up reinforcements<br />

planned for building reservef. <strong>Army</strong> also<br />

complained of its losses in materiel, caused by<br />

American air and artillery action. "The battle<br />

of supply, unprecedented in severity, had to be<br />

waged without noticeable support from our own<br />

air force. 1I<br />

011 16 July, the American advance south to Ie<br />

M esnii-Durand caused fresh alarm, and w<strong>as</strong> attributed<br />

to the poor performance of newly committed<br />

units of the [#h Parachute Regiment.<br />

Their failure "confirms our experience that llewly<br />

committed troops which have 'lOt yet developed<br />

teamwork and are thrown into heavy battle without<br />

having been broken in, sufler disproportionately<br />

heavy losses." The Pont-Hebert bridge position<br />

w<strong>as</strong> finally given up <strong>as</strong> lost, and Seventh<br />

<strong>Army</strong> notified <strong>Army</strong> Group that, <strong>as</strong> a result of<br />

American progress west of the Vire, the flank of<br />

the 352d (e<strong>as</strong>t of the river) w<strong>as</strong> ill danger, and<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!