05.04.2013 Views

ASPR Journal, V14 - Iapsop.com

ASPR Journal, V14 - Iapsop.com

ASPR Journal, V14 - Iapsop.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Illusions in Psychical Research. 5<br />

would be easily proved if it were. On the other hand, if it be<br />

radically different from the world we know or can perceive and<br />

conceive from sensory experience, it can not be rationally<br />

described to us in the terms we expect or demand. Or to put<br />

it briefly, if it be like the present world we can hardly believe<br />

it and if it be radically different we can not prove it. Consequently<br />

those who demand easy, clear information about it do<br />

not know what they ask. Superficial interpretation of the accounts<br />

is not to be tolerated. I mean by this that we cannot take<br />

our ordinary sensory meaning in terms as properly expressive<br />

of the facts. The process of <strong>com</strong>municating is most probably<br />

a symbolic one, a pictographic process involving the interpretation<br />

by the subconsciousness of the medium of these symbolic<br />

pictures which are not properly representative as in sense<br />

perception supposedly construed, but merely indicative of something<br />

which may have remote analogies with our normal conceptions<br />

and those remote analogies expressible in terms of<br />

mental states and not in terms of physical things. The usual<br />

habi't is to take each statement on its superficial meaning as we<br />

would when interpreting descriptions of the physical world. and<br />

then take offense at anything that seems to contradict it or<br />

that seems preposterous. The fact is that it may turn but that<br />

the apparently or even really preposterous statements will be the<br />

clue to the correct conception of the facts. The reason for<br />

this cannot be gone into here. I can only remark boldly that<br />

I do not flinch at the ribaldry and gibes of the Philistine at this .<br />

point. I accept his challenge and should push him to the wall<br />

on the very things about which he seems most assured. But<br />

we may as well recognize at once that we cannot assume the<br />

same method of interpretation of messages about the nature of<br />

the spiritual world as we do about descriptions of the physical<br />

world unless we first prove that the method of <strong>com</strong>munication<br />

is the same as our sensory process, which we can rather safely<br />

suppose it is not. The construction of our idea of the other<br />

world can be ac<strong>com</strong>plished only by finding a unity in apparent<br />

contradictions, as there is now evidence enough that there is a<br />

unity in records that seem superficially quite chaotic. Here will<br />

lie the solution of the problem.<br />

Digitized by Coogle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!