06.04.2013 Views

Housing and Support Program (HASP): Final Evaluation Report

Housing and Support Program (HASP): Final Evaluation Report

Housing and Support Program (HASP): Final Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

Section 2 Method<br />

2.2 Participants<br />

As noted, data were collected from a range of key<br />

individuals <strong>and</strong> groups associated with <strong>HASP</strong>. The<br />

clients involved in <strong>HASP</strong> formed the cohort of primary<br />

interest. Other key groups included clinical staff,<br />

support workers/staff, <strong>Support</strong>s Facilitators <strong>and</strong><br />

housing providers. An overview of each sample is<br />

provided below.<br />

2.2.1 Client sample<br />

<strong>HASP</strong> commenced as a ‘pilot’ program in 2006 with<br />

80 places being made available over the 2006–2007<br />

fi nancial year. All individuals entering <strong>HASP</strong> in the<br />

2006–2007 year had existing recurrent funding<br />

arrangements in place either through Disability<br />

Services or Queensl<strong>and</strong> Health. Their accommodation<br />

needs were met by the former Department of <strong>Housing</strong><br />

(now known as <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>and</strong> Homelessness Services).<br />

Since <strong>HASP</strong> commenced in 2006, 194 places have<br />

been funded through the program (Table 2.1).<br />

However, since 10 new clients were selected to fi ll<br />

the vacancies created by those who left the program,<br />

a total of 204 clients have been offered <strong>HASP</strong><br />

packages over the four years (2006–2010).<br />

Table 2.2 Clients enrolled in the study<br />

Total clients<br />

funded through<br />

<strong>HASP</strong> (n=204)<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Clients unavailable<br />

to the evaluation<br />

204 26 withdrawn from program<br />

14 in transition – not living in<br />

community<br />

6 deceased<br />

1 in High Secure Unit<br />

1 in Medium Secure Unit<br />

1 in CCU<br />

1 in nursing home<br />

1 in hospital (physical health)<br />

Clients available but unwilling/<br />

unable to participate<br />

45 refused to participate<br />

19 too unwell to participate<br />

7 have intellectual/cognitive<br />

problems – unable to<br />

participate<br />

2 living in remote location<br />

51 Unavailable 73 Unable/unwilling<br />

to participate<br />

Of these, 153 were living in the community at the time<br />

of the evaluation (March–July 2010) <strong>and</strong> 80 of these<br />

were enrolled in the study (Table 2.1).<br />

Table 2.1 Funded places <strong>and</strong> clients living<br />

in the community<br />

Year Number<br />

of <strong>HASP</strong><br />

places<br />

<strong>HASP</strong><br />

clients<br />

living in the<br />

community<br />

at time of<br />

evaluation<br />

Clients enrolled<br />

in the evaluation<br />

204 204 – 51 = 153 153 – 73 = 80 80<br />

Clients<br />

enrolled<br />

in the<br />

evaluation<br />

2006–2007 80 64 26 (40.6%)<br />

2007–2008 40 33 18 (54.5%)<br />

2008–2009 40 34 21 (61.8%)<br />

2009–2010 34 22 15 (68.2%)<br />

Total 194 153 80 (51.6%)<br />

Of the 153 clients available for inclusion in the<br />

evaluation, 73 of these were unable or unwilling<br />

to be involved in the evaluation. The reasons for this<br />

are summarised in the table below.<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!