Housing and Support Program (HASP): Final Evaluation Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation team Dr Tom Meehan Dept of Psychiatry (University of Queensland) and Director, Service Evaluation & Research The Park, Centre for Mental Health Wacol Qld 4076 Dr Dan Siskind Consultant Psychiatrist Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research and Metro South Health Service District Ms Kathy Madson Project Offi cer Service Evaluation & Research Unit The Park, Centre for Mental Health Wacol Qld 4076 Ms Nicole Shepherd Project Offi cer Service Evaluation & Research Unit The Park, Centre for Mental Health Wacol Qld 4076 Acknowledgments We are indebted to a number of organisations and individuals for their support and assistance during the conduct of this study. We would like to thank the consumers and staff of the various non-government organisations and government departments who so generously gave of their time to participate in this evaluation. This evaluation was funded by the Queensland Department of Communities and Queensland Health.
Final Evaluation Report of the Queensland Government’s Housing and Support Program Dr Tom Meehan Ms Kathy Madson Ms Nicole Shepherd Dr Dan Siskind Department of Psychiatry (UQ) and Service Evaluation and Research Unit The Park, Centre for Mental Health November 2010
Page 1: Department of Psychiatry (UQ) and S
Page 5 and 6: • Community integration While eig
Page 7 and 8: List of contents Executive summary
Page 9 and 10: Section 1 Introduction Since the 19
Page 11 and 12: 1.1.1 HASP — Management Structure
Page 13 and 14: 1.2 Housing and supports - previous
Page 15 and 16: Table 1.2.2 Outcomes for clients mo
Page 17 and 18: activities, while others tried to c
Page 19 and 20: 1.2.6 Section summary It is clear f
Page 21 and 22: Section 2 Method 2.1 Design The stu
Page 23 and 24: 2.2.1.2 Clients unavailable to part
Page 25 and 26: 2.2.1.5 Clinical staff — sample F
Page 27 and 28: 4) Data collected from mental healt
Page 29 and 30: 2.4 Procedure 2.4.1 Clients - proce
Page 31 and 32: All focus group discussions and ind
Page 33 and 34: However, it was clear that the deve
Page 35 and 36: Importance of the Supports Facilita
Page 37 and 38: Accountability There was a percepti
Page 39 and 40: Support workers highlighted issues
Page 41 and 42: 4.1.2 Client perceptions of support
Page 43 and 44: In general, Case Managers expressed
Page 45 and 46: 4.2.2 Client perceptions of the amo
Page 47 and 48: Support workers felt, as a result o
Page 49 and 50: 4.2.8 Amount of support required in
Page 51 and 52: 4.3.2 Living arrangements The major
Page 53 and 54:
4.3.7 Housing in HASP — compariso
Page 55 and 56:
The majority of HASP clients (76%)
Page 57 and 58:
5.2 Satisfaction with key life doma
Page 59 and 60:
5.7 Depth of friendships We explore
Page 61 and 62:
5.11 Community involvement Clients
Page 63 and 64:
5.13 Section summary During our int
Page 65 and 66:
etter functioning). However, while
Page 67 and 68:
6.7 Physical and mental health Link
Page 69 and 70:
6.10 Section summary The average ti
Page 71 and 72:
7.2 Comparing HASP with inpatient/r
Page 73 and 74:
of applications, increase Case Mana
Page 75 and 76:
available when and where needed by
Page 77 and 78:
8.4 The ability of the program to m
Page 79 and 80:
Section 9 Recommendations 1. More i
Page 81 and 82:
Section 10 Reference list Anthony,
Page 83 and 84:
Shepherd, G., Murray, A. & Muijen,
Page 85 and 86:
Housing and Support Program (HASP)
show all

Housing and Support Program (HASP): Final Evaluation Report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?