06.05.2013 Views

Advanced Wind Turbine Program Next Generation Turbine ... - NREL

Advanced Wind Turbine Program Next Generation Turbine ... - NREL

Advanced Wind Turbine Program Next Generation Turbine ... - NREL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

posed in conjunction with the direct-drive generator concept, GE’s concept evolved to consider it<br />

as a possible replacement for the bedplate main frame regardless of the drive train arrangement.<br />

(a) Large Bearing Support (b) Tubular Nacelle<br />

Figure 4. Direct-Drive Support System<br />

The motivation for using welded steel sheet is that the latter could be cut, rolled, and welded<br />

quite inexpensively, either in a factory setting or even in a field assembly facility. Minimal finish<br />

machining would be required, and the entire structure should save substantial money. Significant<br />

main frame weight reductions were predicted.<br />

Extensive structural analysis of the tubular nacelle concept was conducted. This analysis was<br />

based around replacing the bedplate for the 1.5 MW POC turbine with the welded steel tubular<br />

nacelle. Internal structure was added in order to add rigidity to the cylindrical skin structure and<br />

to distribute the loads to the skin and the rest of the support structure in a reasonable fashion. An<br />

optimization of the tubular nacelle design was conducted in an attempt to minimize the amount<br />

of material used while maintaining structural integrity. Welded steel does not have particularly<br />

high fatigue strength, only 4.5 ksi, or 31 MPa. Figure 5 below illustrates the stress distribution<br />

for the final “optimized” design. Even this design, exhibiting areas of excessive fatigue (gray<br />

areas in Figure 5), weighs over twice what the existing bedplate weighs. As a result, this configuration<br />

is expected to cost more than the GE 1.5 MW bedplate and fiberglass nacelle. Further optimization<br />

of the design might be expected to shave more cost,, but not enough to provide a significant<br />

benefit. As shown in Figure 5, the distribution of material does not match the distribution<br />

of stress. A great amount of material above the centerline and behind the tower is very<br />

lightly stressed. This design was an inefficient structure for this application.<br />

17<br />

`

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!