06.05.2013 Views

Advanced Wind Turbine Program Next Generation Turbine ... - NREL

Advanced Wind Turbine Program Next Generation Turbine ... - NREL

Advanced Wind Turbine Program Next Generation Turbine ... - NREL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3.2 Mechanical Loads Testing of the EMD <strong>Turbine</strong><br />

Mechanical loads testing was conducted on the EMD turbine between June 11, 2002 and September<br />

17, 2002. A total of 77 hours of valid data were collected during normal operation of the<br />

turbine. The objective of the loads testing was to determine the relationships between wind conditions<br />

and loads on the POC turbine under all normal and emergency operating conditions.<br />

Loads were found to be acceptable.<br />

GE conducted an internal study of the comparison between the measured mechanical loads and<br />

those predicted by the dynamic simulations. The results show that the dynamic simulations do<br />

an acceptable job of predicting the blade flapwise fatigue and the shaft torsion and bending fatigue.<br />

They also generally do a good job of predicting the mean shaft torque.<br />

The figures also show that the simulations tend to slightly underpredict the blade edgewise fatigue<br />

and tower bending fatigue. This discrepancy is due, in part, to discrepancies in the calculation<br />

of the rotating axes in the dynamic simulations versus the measured data. In general, however,<br />

the agreement between predicted and measured data seems quite reasonable and inspires<br />

confidence in the use of the simulations.<br />

4.3.3 Acoustic Noise Testing of the EMD <strong>Turbine</strong><br />

<strong>Turbine</strong> and background acoustic noise data were collected between May 2, 2002 and May 4,<br />

2002. The A-weighted sound power level at 8 m/s wind speed was calculated using two methods<br />

for determining wind speed. The first method uses wind speed as measured on a temporary 10m<br />

meteorological tower upwind of the turbine. The second method derives the wind speed from<br />

measurements of turbine power and a power curve obtained from power performance testing. In<br />

the case of the present testing, the two methods yielded very similar results of, respectively,<br />

103.0 dBA and 103.3 dBA sound power levels. Additional acoustic testing included wind speed<br />

sensitivity, directivity, one-third octave spectra, and tonal analysis. Figure 43 shows a comparison<br />

of the EMD noise levels to levels historically associated with wind turbines of various sizes.<br />

It is significant to note that the EMD turbine exhibits noise emissions below the average for turbines<br />

of similar size.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!