18.05.2013 Views

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7 INTERNATIONAL ... - Fizika

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7 INTERNATIONAL ... - Fizika

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7 INTERNATIONAL ... - Fizika

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D. Bernatavičius et al. / Medical Physics in the Baltic States 7 (2009) 102 - 105<br />

Fig.3 shows time dependence of the signal quality:<br />

time span, which is needed to drop down field strength,<br />

is bigger when the distance between operating phone<br />

and transmitter tower is longer. If the signal quality is<br />

high enough, it takes less time to drop down the field<br />

strength (Fig.4)<br />

E, V/m<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Bad connection<br />

Good connection<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

t, s<br />

Fig. 4. The influence of signal quality for calling mode<br />

We were trying to get clear relationship between<br />

electric field strength and the distance to the transmitter<br />

tower. Unfortunately it was not possible because of the<br />

influence of other factors like uneven terrain. The<br />

trends for different modes of phone operation are<br />

presented in Fig. 5-8.<br />

E, V/m<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

900<br />

1400<br />

1523<br />

1562<br />

1834<br />

2052<br />

2250<br />

3138<br />

4332<br />

5300<br />

6086<br />

6716<br />

7579<br />

8073<br />

9153<br />

9734<br />

10484<br />

13073<br />

d, m<br />

Fig. 5. Field strength distribution along the road for a<br />

switch on mode<br />

104<br />

E, V/m<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

900<br />

1400<br />

1523<br />

1562<br />

1834<br />

2052<br />

2250<br />

3138<br />

4332<br />

5300<br />

6086<br />

6716<br />

7579<br />

8073<br />

9153<br />

9734<br />

10484<br />

13073<br />

d, m<br />

Fig. 6. Field strength distribution along the road for a<br />

calling mode<br />

E, V/m<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

900<br />

1400<br />

1523<br />

1562<br />

1834<br />

2052<br />

2250<br />

3138<br />

4332<br />

5300<br />

6086<br />

6716<br />

7579<br />

8073<br />

9153<br />

9734<br />

10484<br />

13073<br />

d, m<br />

Fig. 7. Field strength distribution along the road for a<br />

conversation mode<br />

E, V/m<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

900<br />

1400<br />

1523<br />

1562<br />

1834<br />

2052<br />

2250<br />

3138<br />

4332<br />

5300<br />

6086<br />

6716<br />

7579<br />

8073<br />

9153<br />

9734<br />

10484<br />

13073<br />

d, m<br />

Fig. 8. Field strength distribution along the road for a<br />

sending SMS mode.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Radiated electromagnetic waves are most intensive at<br />

the beginning of the connection. Then intensity<br />

decreases gradually to certain magnitude, which is only<br />

enough to sustain the connection. This settled electric<br />

field value might be hardly distinguishable from<br />

background radiation if the connection is of good

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!