01.06.2013 Views

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Neo</strong>-<strong>Bonapartism</strong>? A <strong>parallel</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III<br />

<strong>Bonapartism</strong>. With his accession to power, Napoleon III himself coined the term <strong>Bonapartism</strong> as<br />

a label for his ideology, defining it in his earlier correspondence with Laity in date of July 1838,<br />

quoted by D’Alembert in his Napoleonian Political Dictionary in 1849 as “a system which is not<br />

the pale imitation of the English or American constitutions, but rather the governmental<br />

formulation of the principles of the revolution: the hierarchy within democracy, the equality in<br />

front of the Law, the recompense of the patriotic merit (…)” (1838).<br />

The death of Napoleon III <strong>and</strong> the consecutive ending of the Napoleonic empires in France did<br />

not affect the development of <strong>Bonapartism</strong>. On the contrary, <strong>and</strong> as a matter of fact, the<br />

interest aroused by this ideology sustained a discontinuous redefinition of its dynamics <strong>and</strong><br />

components. Answering the question – what is <strong>Bonapartism</strong> after the end of the imperial<br />

experience in France – Bluche asserted that it is “a new form of political power, allying the<br />

(passive) democracy to (active) authority; a centrist formula relying on a composite legitimacy;<br />

in sum a form of authoritarian governance <strong>and</strong> centralizing administration” (1980). The chain of<br />

realignments to <strong>Bonapartism</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ed even supplementary with the observations of Karl Marx<br />

<strong>and</strong> Friedrich Engels who successively developed “the earliest <strong>and</strong> most fruitful model of<br />

<strong>Bonapartism</strong>” (Dulffer, 1976). Dulffer presents an even further developed vision of the<br />

Bonapartist framework by stating that : “plebiscitarian approval, censorship, centralism, finance<br />

capitalism, the terror of the state as well as the appeal to workers <strong>and</strong> peasants along with the<br />

simultaneous extension of the army as an instrument of power are among his topics” (1976).<br />

Sequentially presented as a political model relying on the “monopoly of all state powers”<br />

(Richter, 2005), <strong>and</strong> as an instrument of class domination by Marx, <strong>Bonapartism</strong> is today<br />

perceived as a centuries-crosser political model based on a “political movement associated<br />

A website dedicated to this project is available starting Dec 7 th 2010 at: http://www.aui.ma/personal/~Y.Assaoui/<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!