01.06.2013 Views

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Neo</strong>-<strong>Bonapartism</strong>? A <strong>parallel</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III<br />

national consensus” (2003). The same mechanism was used after his Coup d’Etat, when he<br />

envisaged transforming his regime into an empire. It is therefore via a popular plebiscite that<br />

the title of Emperor of the French was awarded to him after the November 1852’s plebiscite. It<br />

is from this very perspective that <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s obsession with popular support establishes<br />

some bridges with the Emperor’s conception of legitimacy. Alain Duhamel highlighted <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s<br />

thirst of popularity when he described him as “a republican, respectful of the universal suffrage;<br />

but also a plebiscitary, greedy of supports <strong>and</strong> popular consecrations” (2009). Duhamel labeled<br />

therefore <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s conception of legitimacy as a “<strong>Bonapartism</strong> of the 21 st century” since this<br />

model seems to rely on both the French republic as an institutional framework <strong>and</strong> the<br />

“supremacy of the power of a leader legitimized by the universal suffrage” (2009). As a matter<br />

of fact, this mechanism is highly valued in the French conception of democratic governance: in<br />

a system where the two criteria that matter are formally the elections’ results (at all levels,<br />

even in the regional ballot vote) <strong>and</strong> informally the satisfactions’ polls, a popular sanction is<br />

generally assorted with a resignation from political matters (it was the case recently for Lionel<br />

Jospin) or an unquestionable decrease of legitimacy. On the contrary, being chosen by the<br />

people allows the elected president to benefit from a legitimacy no one is able to question.<br />

Accordingly, rallying the masses at any cost from such an obsessive perspective presupposes<br />

other underlying mechanisms, among which a populist discourse likely to be adopted by the<br />

population. At this regard, Napoleon III <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s approaches are a case in point regarding<br />

the overall physiognomy of their electorate, though they dealt with different societal<br />

expectations. While Napoleon III relied heavily on the prestige of his imperial uncle within the<br />

popular classes <strong>and</strong> capitalized upon it to forge political alliances with his main opponents,<br />

A website dedicated to this project is available starting Dec 7 th 2010 at: http://www.aui.ma/personal/~Y.Assaoui/<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!