01.06.2013 Views

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Neo</strong>-<strong>Bonapartism</strong>? A <strong>parallel</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III<br />

On the constitutional reform chapter, <strong>Sarkozy</strong> followed the same path as Napoleon III; he<br />

engaged a process of reforming of the constitution to counter the “crisis of representation” he<br />

so strongly denounced in his presidential program, before finally backing up. As a matter of<br />

fact, <strong>and</strong> as explained by Lévy <strong>and</strong> Skach in 2007, <strong>Sarkozy</strong> “appointed 13 sages to a committee<br />

headed by former Prime Minister Edouard Balladur <strong>and</strong> entrusted with undertaking the task of<br />

reflecting on the modernization of the Fifth Republic”. After this committee’s presentation of its<br />

recommendations, <strong>Sarkozy</strong> realized that the application of such reforming will endanger his<br />

quasi-monopoly of power (since it proposed some amendments relative to the executive<br />

branch). Accordingly, this committee was “thanked for its enlightened remarks” (<strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s<br />

speech in date of 15 th December 2008), but the constitutional reform stopped there, with no<br />

prospect of being enacted anytime soon, at least under <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s presidency.<br />

From the latter, <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III are very resembling in their court-like approach: both<br />

preferred short-circuiting their traditional partners (mainly the government, parliament, <strong>and</strong><br />

senate) <strong>and</strong> delegated (relatively) their power to a very close circle of collaborators. This<br />

mechanism of governance, described by the French Leftist publication Marianne as the “archaic<br />

monarchization of the mode of governance” (2010), ends up with a problematic democratic<br />

deficit; obvious for Napoleon III, yet more insidious for <strong>Sarkozy</strong>. As stated by Derbyshire, “the<br />

appointments of Le Douaron <strong>and</strong> Lambert show the importance that <strong>Sarkozy</strong> attaches to having<br />

advisers <strong>and</strong> collaborators who "owe him everything", <strong>and</strong> in whom he places the kind of trust<br />

he rarely, if ever, shows to his ministers; in this arrangement, the adviser plays courtier to<br />

<strong>Sarkozy</strong>'s prince” (2010). As a matter of fact, Eric Le Douaron <strong>and</strong> Christian Lambert are both<br />

former high police officers (the first for instance was the chief of the RAID unit of intervention)<br />

A website dedicated to this project is available starting Dec 7 th 2010 at: http://www.aui.ma/personal/~Y.Assaoui/<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!