01.06.2013 Views

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Neo</strong>-<strong>Bonapartism</strong>? A <strong>parallel</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III<br />

very well since he extensively relied upon it during his exile years. This very situation which<br />

enabled the Prince Napoleon to shake Louis Philippe’s reign aroused his awareness of the<br />

powerful impact of a liberated press serving as a tribune of freely expressed dissidences <strong>and</strong><br />

oppositions. Not that Napoleon III feared his opponents: as explained before, once they were<br />

spotted by the regime, their fate was put <strong>between</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>s of the police (a situation which<br />

ended up either in imprisonment or in exile). In point of truth, since the emperor seated his<br />

legitimacy on popular plebiscite, controlling the perception of the French population of his rule<br />

via a strict monitoring of the press was primal. D’Alembert cited in his Dictionnaire Politique<br />

Napoléonien the emperor saying according to which he “must preserve the freedom of the press<br />

from the two excesses that compromise it: the arbitrary <strong>and</strong> its own license” (1849).<br />

Accordingly, quick <strong>and</strong> radical measures were taken to ‘protect the freedom of press’, <strong>and</strong><br />

mainly the Press Law of July 16 th 1850 which “required all articles on political or theological<br />

questions to be signed, <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>icapped editors in many other ways” (Thompson, 1955) like the<br />

m<strong>and</strong>atory caution deposit imposed on editors as a proof of their “good will” (in reality the<br />

latter served as a gambling card the authorities used for blackmailing the indocile publications).<br />

Miller details even further the silencing of the press with evocating the Decree Law of 1852<br />

which “introduced a system whereby newspapers directors were allowed only two warnings<br />

before a newspaper was liable to suspension” (1997). Such a situation ended up in a press<br />

whose maneuver of action was limited to the transcription of the imperial accomplishments,<br />

<strong>and</strong> preferably in a gracious tone: a state of affairs denounced by an angry Regnault citing the<br />

British Times saying that “Louis Bonaparte had put civil liberties under the heel of his boots”<br />

(1907) <strong>and</strong> an exiled Hugo bemoaning the suppression of one hundred publications “twenty in<br />

A website dedicated to this project is available starting Dec 7 th 2010 at: http://www.aui.ma/personal/~Y.Assaoui/<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!