Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...
Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...
Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Neo</strong>-<strong>Bonapartism</strong>? A <strong>parallel</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III<br />
inwards the Mediterranean Sea is thus a shifting of policies from the gradual French<br />
detachment in the region, a shift rooted in the Fifth Republic tradition since it was<br />
uninterrupted since the decolonization’s days. World’s leaders discovered with amazement<br />
<strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s Montpellier speech where, <strong>and</strong> as cited by Bowen, “praising the dreams of Napoleon<br />
Bonaparte when he invaded Egypt, Napoleon III when he conquered Algeria, <strong>and</strong> Marshal<br />
Hubert Lyautey, the first French Resident General of Morocco, <strong>Sarkozy</strong> said they all participated<br />
in a Mediterranean vision, which he called one of “civilization not conquest” (2007).<br />
This Mediterranean dream was to be materialized by one of <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s most ambitious proposal:<br />
the creation of a Mediterranean Union led by a France trying to reconcile its past colonial<br />
dominion over the region with the evolution of this latter’s strategic importance within the<br />
international relations arena. On this, Nash considered <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s “re-creation of this Napoleonic<br />
dream” as a foresighted enterprise since it relies on the “re-creation of the Roman’s Empire<br />
boundaries - which actually stretched further, but did include all the Mediterranean” (2007).<br />
By this way, the latter resonates with Louis Napoleon’s imperial expansion in the region, even if<br />
his colonial undertaking was far more ambitious than <strong>Sarkozy</strong>’s. As a matter of fact, the imperial<br />
foreign policy targeted two strategic regions: Africa <strong>and</strong> the Eastern Mediterranean. Concerning<br />
the African continent first, the emperor’s conquest of Algeria in 1857 which made him describe<br />
himself “gr<strong>and</strong>ly as just as much the emperor of the Arabs as the French” (Miller, 1997), was<br />
closely followed by the establishment of other Southern colonies, <strong>and</strong> mainly in Senegal,<br />
Guinea, <strong>and</strong> Dahomey. On the Eastern Mediterranean expansionist policy, the French<br />
expedition to Syria in 1860 <strong>and</strong> the engineering of the Suez Canal project marked the<br />
boundaries-less colonial appetite of the emperor. On that, Thompson noted that “whatever the<br />
A website dedicated to this project is available starting Dec 7 th 2010 at: http://www.aui.ma/personal/~Y.Assaoui/<br />
79