01.06.2013 Views

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Neo</strong>-<strong>Bonapartism</strong>? A <strong>parallel</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III<br />

Another noticeable feature of the foreign policy, Bonapartist style, is its reliance upon hyper-<br />

activism <strong>and</strong> the preaching of the big conferences culture. At this level, a kind of <strong>parallel</strong>ism can<br />

be established with its reliance upon popular plebiscite at the domestic level: it is as if, in its<br />

desire to manage the collective sake, <strong>Bonapartism</strong> needs a kind of legitimacy brought by its<br />

fellow foreign leaders vis a vis its foreign undertakings. However, such an approach is not<br />

contradictory with the unilateral decision-making approach, especially when the domestic<br />

interests are in contradiction with what the multilateral actors seems to prefer.<br />

Napoleon III for instance advocated for decades his fondness for multilateral solutions to<br />

diplomatic crises, especially the ones involving, in a way or another, his European neighbors. As<br />

explained by Echard, “from 1849 to 1963, he repeatedly urged the assembling of a general<br />

congress: during the same period, he responded to every European crisis with at least a<br />

willingness to seek solutions at the conference table” (1966). It was notably the case for the<br />

Paris conference of November 1852 that settled the Franco-Russo fight over Constantinople (in<br />

Paris’ favor), another Paris meeting in August 1858 where a convention dismantling the 1815’s<br />

treaties was signed by a European Congress, or the 1866’s conference organized conjointly with<br />

Otto Von Bismarck to reach an agreement on the Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen c<strong>and</strong>idacy for the<br />

Spanish throne. In <strong>parallel</strong>, <strong>and</strong> as outlined by Gildea, the emperor pursued an active policy of<br />

mediation <strong>between</strong> disputed countries; like when he “mediated <strong>between</strong> Prussia <strong>and</strong> Austria,<br />

taking Venetia from Austria to bestow on the humiliated Italians, <strong>and</strong> hoping for some<br />

compensation for France in the future” (2003). Finally, unilateral foreign policy decisions were<br />

also taken by Louis Napoleon; it is interesting at this regard to cite the imperial settling of the<br />

Italian question without any form of consultation with Italy. Gildea explains that this<br />

A website dedicated to this project is available starting Dec 7 th 2010 at: http://www.aui.ma/personal/~Y.Assaoui/<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!