01.06.2013 Views

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

Neo-Bonapartism? A parallel between Nicolas Sarkozy and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Neo</strong>-<strong>Bonapartism</strong>? A <strong>parallel</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>Nicolas</strong> <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III<br />

referring to the state injection of money in the Crédit Agricole, according to which « the<br />

finances of any big state should offer the means to face extraordinary circumstances” (Des Idées<br />

Napoléoniennes, 1860). Napoleon III’s incentive <strong>and</strong> encouragement to the French banking<br />

system was to trigger off a domino effect over the economy in its entirety. According to Wolf,<br />

the funds of the banking institutions passed from 250 million French francs in 1852-1854, to<br />

500 million in 1855 <strong>and</strong> 520 million in 1856. The state initial stimulation ended up in a situation<br />

where private investors quickly recaptured the torch: <strong>between</strong> 1848 <strong>and</strong> 1851, two thirds of<br />

these investment funds were supplied by the state, “this figure was no more than 10% <strong>between</strong><br />

1852 <strong>and</strong> 1856: the production of cast iron more than doubled as it did for iron <strong>and</strong> steel, it<br />

tripled for iron ore <strong>and</strong> increased by 80% for coal” (Wolf).<br />

At this point, the two leaders’ focus on the French banking is closely related to another<br />

pattern of their economic policy: the promotion <strong>and</strong> sustainment of national champions. As a<br />

matter of fact, if both <strong>Sarkozy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Napoleon III were so attached to preserve sound financings<br />

it is because they expected from it to favor either the emergence or the preservation of what<br />

one might call a patriotic industrialism. On the one h<strong>and</strong>, worried by the British <strong>and</strong> German<br />

competition, the emperor strived toward the stimulation of the French coal <strong>and</strong> iron industries.<br />

As explained by Bernstein, “by a decree of August 1860, Louis Napoleon authorized government<br />

loans to private firms <strong>and</strong> "great solicitude" was shown for coal <strong>and</strong> iron establishments<br />

because of their fundamental importance to the entire economy: to these signal may be added<br />

the completion of the telegraph system, <strong>and</strong> subsidization of steamship lines” (1960). At this<br />

point, the emperor succeeded in accompanying the development of the industrial base of the<br />

country.<br />

A website dedicated to this project is available starting Dec 7 th 2010 at: http://www.aui.ma/personal/~Y.Assaoui/<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!