28.06.2013 Views

Review - American Jewish Archives

Review - American Jewish Archives

Review - American Jewish Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Book <strong>Review</strong>s 241<br />

cultural, ethnic, and national identity. No study of any national<br />

group can omit its literary oeuvre, all the more so in the case of the<br />

Jews. At a time when Hebrew and Yiddish literature were divided<br />

primarily over the issues of national identity for the Jews, the place of<br />

Jews in Europe and the United States, and their regard for 'Eretz Yisra'el,<br />

it was Yiddish literature that became the domain of most proponents<br />

of extraterritorialism anti- and non-Zionist sentiment. Though<br />

a justifiable medium for illustrating the aspiration of Jews who chose<br />

to remain in Europe, or even those reestablishing themselves in the<br />

<strong>American</strong> diaspora, Yiddish literature is not the proper resource for<br />

an examination or illustration of <strong>Jewish</strong> national feelings. So while Jacobson<br />

selected to demonstrate the pro-Zionist (or proponents of what<br />

he terms "Yiddish nationalism" [IO~I]) sentiments of some Yiddish writers<br />

- among them Liessen, Rosenfeld - against non-Zionists such as<br />

Mendele Makher [sic]Sforim, Peretz, Cahan, and Kobrin and concludes<br />

that "Overall the relationship of Yiddish literature to <strong>Jewish</strong> nationalism<br />

was deeply mixed(xxo), he pays but scant attention to that of Hebrew<br />

literature and its overwhelmingly unequivocal stand on the<br />

subject (94-95).<br />

This reader would have been interested in seeing the contextualization<br />

of the Hebrew language as a more central component in a<br />

study that measures the national impulses still pervading <strong>Jewish</strong> immigrant,<br />

and post immigrant, life in the United States. While the author<br />

is correct in his assertion that the Yiddish press was the largest<br />

conduit bringing information to immigrant Jews, with a readership<br />

certainly exceeding the number of subscriptions by far, its numbers<br />

should have been noted not for 1898 (Yiddishes tageblatt) but for the<br />

post-1900 years, when the numbers of Jews in the United States ballooned<br />

from an estimated million in 1900 to 4.5 million by 1925. In<br />

short, the study misses the <strong>Jewish</strong> population it should have examined.<br />

By overlooking the Hebrew component-press, culture clubs, theater,<br />

journals, literature, religion, and so forth-the study effectively<br />

neutralizes the images of Zionism and <strong>Jewish</strong> nationalism that have<br />

followed <strong>Jewish</strong> immigrants from their east European lands of the diaspora<br />

to their new-found diaspora. Hebrew publications, for instance,<br />

though fewer than those in Yiddish, had the support of a few thousand<br />

active readers, and one can only guess at how many listeners

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!