28.06.2013 Views

Review - American Jewish Archives

Review - American Jewish Archives

Review - American Jewish Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Book <strong>Review</strong>s 203<br />

policy of brutality, thus initiating the future pattern of European-<br />

Indian relations. Moreover, the history of race relations in New<br />

York - in the perception of Binder and Reimers one of the most en-<br />

during troubling aspects of New York history-was ominous from<br />

its inception. Under Dutch rule the institution of slavery was rather<br />

loosely defined, but its legitimacy was beyond questioning. Under<br />

English rule, when the dire need for labor made slavery pivotal to<br />

the colony's economy, the legal status of bondsmen gradually wors-<br />

ened as owners defined their slaves as "propertyl' with few or no<br />

rights. Although the <strong>American</strong> Revolution and the influence of En-<br />

lightenment ideals did stimulate abolitionist sentiment, black New<br />

Yorkers were not granted equal citizenship rights - a situation that<br />

prepared a legacy of continued racial prejudice and discrimination.<br />

By starting the ethnic history of New York in the colonial era,<br />

rather than at the conventional point of departure (with the mass<br />

migrations of the Irish and the Germans in the 1830s and 1840s),<br />

Binder and Reimers subtly challenge the dominant historical pic-<br />

ture in which the majority status of Anglo-Saxon culture is taken as a<br />

given. As the Dutch and Anglo-Saxons reach upper-class status,<br />

however, they disappear from view. At higher social ranks, ethnic-<br />

ity is somehow translated into class. This is unfortunate, because<br />

the ways in which "Knickerbocker" and especially "WASP" culture<br />

achieved and maintained a social and cultural hegemony in New<br />

York, using "descent" not only as a basis of exclusivity but as a<br />

grounds for social and cultural exclusion, go unexamined.<br />

The fact that the upper echelons of the ethnic and racial hierarchy<br />

in New York apparently fall outside the frame of what Binder and<br />

Reimers consider the "ethnic" history of New York is curious con-<br />

sidering the fact that, in other respects, the authors do present a<br />

long-term perspective that takes the transformations of ethnic<br />

groups into account. Their approach conforms to a model in which<br />

ethnicity in America is seen as a form of solidarity rooted in com-<br />

monalities of culture, experience, and interest. Each ethnic group's<br />

distinctive experience is seen as the product of a complex interplay<br />

between the group's characteristics at the point of entry and the<br />

conditions confronting the group at the time and place of settlement.<br />

Ethnic solidarity generally is most pronounced in the first two gen-<br />

erations after settlement, when group commonalities are strongest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!