Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
206 <strong>American</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> <strong>Archives</strong><br />
can account for the fact that African <strong>American</strong>s as a group have<br />
consistently failed to conform to the patterns that have characterized<br />
the social and economic trajectory of other ethnicities? Or, as<br />
William Julius Wilson has argued in The Declining Significance of<br />
Race (1978) and When Work Disappears (1996)~ have there been major<br />
economic and social changes that have, for very specific reasons,<br />
disproportionately affected African <strong>American</strong>s and Puerto Ricans<br />
and canceled out many of the advances made by these groups between<br />
1945 and 1970?<br />
The reason it is important to develop a more explicit perspective<br />
on the present situation lies in the fact that data similar to those advanced<br />
by Binder and Reimers have been used to promote very<br />
conservative causes. For Thomas Sowell, for instance, in his Ethnic<br />
America: A History? the dynamics of ethnic stratification- the fact that<br />
immigrants start at the bottom and work their way up -delegitimize<br />
the notion of the existence of a majority and a minority culture.<br />
Similarly, the fact that Jews and Japanese have "succeeded" in <strong>American</strong><br />
society, against the odds of racism and bigotry, in his view, undermines<br />
any idea of lasting and potentially debilitating effects of<br />
racism. Moreover, because the one assured route to immigrant success<br />
is individual entrepreneurship, federal assistance for public education,<br />
according to Sowell, will have little or no effect on the<br />
social mobility of those in the lower economic ranks. Needless to<br />
say, arguments such as these, scientifically, leave a lot to be desired.<br />
Unfortunately, politically, they do seem to have a wide currency.<br />
By, from the outset, positioning black New Yorkers outside the<br />
range of "tolerancel' the authors evoke a certain historical determinism<br />
and place themselves at an analytical disadvantage. Racism becomes<br />
a separate and timeless category, the one last remove from the<br />
attainment of the promise of liberal pluralism, rather than a phenomenon<br />
that can be deconstructed into its various component<br />
parts, and is inflected by a particular historical context.<br />
What exactly are the contingencies that have made the history of<br />
African <strong>American</strong>s diverge from that of other ethnic groups? Why<br />
has racism toward African <strong>American</strong>s proven to be more persistent<br />
than racism toward other groups and other forms of prejudice<br />
based on religious difference or national origin? How does the decline<br />
of those prejudices shed light on the plight of African <strong>American</strong>s?