28.06.2013 Views

Review - American Jewish Archives

Review - American Jewish Archives

Review - American Jewish Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210 <strong>American</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> <strong>Archives</strong><br />

portionately affects certain regions, ethnic groups, occupational<br />

sectors, and economic classes within the home country"(xix).<br />

Using empirical analyses, Eisenberg asserts that migrants from<br />

the South Pale were overrepresented among the early agricultural<br />

colonists and that they differed ideologically and demographically<br />

from later migrants. <strong>Jewish</strong> immigrants from the South Pale had been<br />

more integrated into secular society and less religiously traditional<br />

than <strong>Jewish</strong> immigrants from other regions of eastern Europe. They<br />

were also comparatively more concentrated in the commercial sector<br />

and in agricultural and agriculture-related occupations. After docu-<br />

menting these differences, Eisenberg argues, persuasively in my opin-<br />

ion, that differences in these premigration conditions are important<br />

for understanding the shift from farming to mixed farming industry<br />

and the shift from communal ownership to private ownership.<br />

Another important, and perhaps controversial, point made by<br />

the author is a challenging of the heavy emphasis usually put on<br />

pogroms to explain migration. She suggests that "the focus on per-<br />

secutions and on the mass nature of the movement tends to blur the<br />

economic, geographic, and demographic factors that were equally,<br />

if not more, importantn(4). This is a minority perspective but one<br />

that seems to be supported by the author's data. Whether or not one<br />

agrees with Eisenberg on this point, hopefully the attention to pre-<br />

migration factors will become more important in the larger study of<br />

<strong>Jewish</strong> migration.<br />

Between 1881 and 1884, about twenty-four <strong>Jewish</strong> agricultural so-<br />

cieties were established in the United States, about all through Am<br />

Olam or at least with the involvement of some Am Olam members.<br />

Because of its involvement, the Am Olam has been discussed previ-<br />

ously in a number of sources. Eisenberg's thirty-six page chapter on<br />

the Am Olam, however, is one of the best discussions so far because<br />

of its attention to social class, occupation, and religious and other<br />

demographic differences among <strong>Jewish</strong> groups, as we1 as with<br />

non-Jews, in eastern Europe. Eisenberg briefly discusses some of<br />

the other twenty-four Am Olam connected colonies but notes that -<br />

with the exception of the five in southern New Jersey-all were ex-<br />

tremely short- lived and not well documented. The New Jersey<br />

colonies were different in that they were in a relatively temperate<br />

climate and that they were conveniently located close both to mar-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!