View/Open - Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
View/Open - Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
View/Open - Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
References<br />
112. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, et al. (1999) Control of the<br />
DNA Damage Checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 Protein Kinases Through<br />
Distinct Mechanisms. Science 286: 1166–1171.<br />
113. Blankley RT, Lydall D (2004) A domain of Rad9 specifically required for<br />
activation of Chk1 in bud<strong>di</strong>ng yeast. J Cell Sci 117: 601–608.<br />
114. Wang H, Liu D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ (2001) Pds1 phosphorylation in<br />
response to DNA damage is essential for its DNA damage checkpoint<br />
function. Genes Dev 15: 1361–1372.<br />
115. Emili A (1998) MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response<br />
to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2: 183–189.<br />
116. Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF (1998) The bud<strong>di</strong>ng yeast<br />
Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent<br />
hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.<br />
EMBO J 17: 5679–5688.<br />
117. Naiki T, Wakayama T, Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K (2004)<br />
Association of Rad9 with double-strand breaks through a Mec1dependent<br />
mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 24: 3277–3285.<br />
118. Zou L, Elledge SJ (2003) Sensing DNA Damage Through ATRIP<br />
Recognition of RPA-ssDNA Complexes. Science 300: 1542–1548.<br />
119. Smith J, Tho LM, Xu N, Gillespie DA (2010) The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1<br />
pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 108:<br />
73–112.<br />
120. Longhese MP (2008) DNA damage response at functional and<br />
dysfunctional telomeres. Genes Dev 22: 125–140.<br />
121. Smogorzewska A, Karlseder J, Holtgreve-Grez H, Jauch A, de Lange T<br />
(2002) DNA ligase IV-dependent NHEJ of deprotected mammalian<br />
telomeres in G1 and G2. Curr Biol 12: 1635–1644.<br />
122. Celli GB, de Lange T (2005) DNA processing is not required for ATMme<strong>di</strong>ated<br />
telomere damage response after TRF2 deletion. Nat Cell Biol<br />
7: 712–718.<br />
123. Porter SE, Greenwell PW, Ritchie KB, Petes TD (1996) The DNA-bin<strong>di</strong>ng<br />
protein Hdf1p (a putative Ku homologue) is required for maintaining<br />
normal telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res<br />
24: 582–585.<br />
108