12.07.2013 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry

by Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Temporal Expectation of the Author 139<br />

ing for the end within the circles in which the writer lived — not an<br />

expectation that will happen at some unknown point X in time (just<br />

to repeat this), but one in the immediate present. 14<br />

It would seem that only an interpretive a priori against the translation<br />

of the noted lexicographers and modern translations could account<br />

for the views of the commentators cited above.<br />

T/z.e Matter of the “Sitz im Leben”<br />

The deducible internal sitz im Leben (“situation in life”) of the<br />

recipients of Revelation also demands the maintenance of the preponderate<br />

scholarly lexical and translational consensus. John writes to<br />

seven contemporary historical churches (Rev. 1:11 ) facing very real<br />

serious, repeated, and intensi@ing threats (Rev. 2-3). He speaks of<br />

his own present enduring of “the tribulation” with them (Rev. 1:9).<br />

He notes with concern the expectant cry from the altar: “How long,<br />

O Lord?” (Rev. 6:10). Walvoord’s view – that when Jesus eventually<br />

comes He will come with great rapidity — would have offered no<br />

consolation to these persecuted saints. To interpret this passage to<br />

mean that some two or three thousand years in the future Jesus will<br />

come with great rapidity would be a mockery of their historical<br />

circumstances. Surely “this [/v +yEz] is the hinge and staple of the<br />

book. When the advent of Jesus is hailed as a relie~ it is no consolation<br />

to say that the relief will come suddenly; sudden or not, it must<br />

come soon (v. 7), if it is to be of any service.”’5<br />

Mounce’s second possibility – i.e., of the event’s certainty of<br />

occurrence — has little to commend it. After all, the certainty of<br />

Revelation’s eventuation is well-taken care of by the expression M<br />

yev.5u19czz (“must occur”). A simple future tense (“will occur”)<br />

would have served well enough to insure the satisfaction of certainty.<br />

If certainty of eventuation was all that was being urged, why repeatedly<br />

employ the use of a term – in addition to 6st ysv.beaz ! — that<br />

could generate false expectations? Such a question becomes all the<br />

more crucial in light of the other similar word groups employed, as<br />

will be shown shortly.<br />

14. Kurt Aland, A Htstop of Chr-i.stianiQ, vol. 1: From th Beginnings to the Threshold of the<br />

R@-matian, trans. James L. Schaaf (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985), p. 88.<br />

15. James Moffatt, Tb Revelation of St. John ttu Divim, in W. R. Nicoll, cd., Englishman’s<br />

Greek Te@ammt, vol. 5 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, rep. 1980), p. 335.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!