12.07.2013 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry

by Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

278 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL<br />

imperial developments under Nero, rather than any spec~lc legal<br />

datum relative to Christianity. Nevertheless, there is evidence pointing<br />

to an actual confrontation that meets the expectations of the<br />

passage even when literally interpreted.<br />

Domitian and the Emperor Cult<br />

What is more – and this is a crucial point – it should not be a<br />

forgone conclusion that the emperor cult played a role even in the<br />

later (alleged) Flavian persecution under Domitian. “Domitian’s predilection<br />

for being styled dominus et deus nester, ‘our Lord and God’,<br />

stimulated a satirical response in many of his subjects, but would<br />

have been regarded as plain blasphemy by Christians, for whom<br />

there was ‘one God, the Father, . . . and one Lord, Jesus Christ’ (1<br />

Cor. 8:6). But there is no record that this precipitated a clash between<br />

him and the Christians .’ ys<br />

’<br />

Henderson views the material of Revelation differently, but in a<br />

way fully capable of a Neronic interpretation:<br />

The work is full of allusions to a persecution of the Christians as<br />

Christians, and especially for refusing to “worship the Beast” (i.e., in<br />

this connection the Emperor) = dissenters from Caesar-worship. . . .<br />

The great crime is “Caesar-worship.” This of course suits Domitian.<br />

But ji-om other eoiderzce it suits Nero as well – when the Christians<br />

suffered as Christians. . . . Caesar-worship, e.g. at Pergamum, is just<br />

as prominent to a local writer under Nero as later.88<br />

Historian Philip Schaff comments that “the unmistakable allusions<br />

to imperial persecutions apply much better to Nero than to Domitian.<br />

“8 9<br />

Even late date advocate Ramsay admits that the statements<br />

drawn from Revelation as evidence of the Domitianic persecution are<br />

“entirely uncorroborated: not even indirect evidence supports<br />

them. . . . We are reduced to mere general presumptions and estimates<br />

of probabilities. . . . This is the one contemporary account<br />

that has been preserved of the Flavian procedure.”g” To which<br />

87. F. F. Bruce, New Testament Htitoy (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1969), p. 412.<br />

88. Henderson, Nero, p. 440.<br />

89. Philip Schaff, Histoy of the Christian Church, 8 VOIS. (Grand Rapids: Eerdrnans,<br />

[1910] 1950) 1:428. More will be said on this matter of the extent and ~avity of the<br />

persecution in Chap. 17.<br />

90. William M. Ramsay, The Lettirs to Sewn Churcha (Grand Rapids: Baker, [1904]<br />

1963), p. 99.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!