Before Jerusalem Fell

36 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL
James M. Macdonald, T& L~e and Writings o~flt.~ohn (London:
Hodder & Stoughton, 1877).
Frederick Denisen Maurice, Le?ctures on the Apoca@e, 2nd ed. (London:
Macmillan, 1885).
John David Michaelis, Introduction to tk New Testament, vol. 4; and
Saaed Books ~th New lhtamnt. [1]
Charles Pettit M’Ilvaine, l% Evidemes of ChrLtiani~ (Philadelphia:
Smith, English & Co., 1861).
A. D. Momigliano, Cambridge Azzient Histoy ( 1934). [5]
Theodor Mommsen, Roman Histoy, vol. 5. [7]
Charles Herbert Morgan, et. al., Studies in the A#ostolic Church (New
York: Eaton and Mains, 1902), pp. 210ff.
C. F. D. Moule, The Birth of th New Testament, 3rd ed. (New York:
Harper & Row, 1982), p. 174.56
John Augustus Wilhelm Neander, The Histoty of th Planting and
Training of tlu Christian Church by the Apostles, trans. J. E. Ryland
(Philadelphia: James M. Campbell, 1844), pp. 223ff. [3, 6,8]
Sir Isaac Newton, Obsewatiom Upon the Proph.aies of Daniel, and the
Apoca@pse ofSt. John (London: 1732). [2]
Bishop Thomas Newton, Dissertation on th Prophecies (London: 1832).
[2]
A. Niermeyer, Over de echteid derJohanneisch.e Schrjj2en (Haag: 1852). [3)
Alfred Plummer (1891). [1]
Edward Hayes Plumtree, A Popular Exposition of th Epistles to the Seven
Churches ofAsia, 2nd ed. (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1879).
T. Randell, “Revelation” in H. D. M. Spence &Joseph S. Exell, eds.,
The Pulpit Cornmenta~, vol. 22 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, rep.
1950).
James J. L. Ratton, The Apoca@pse of St. John (London: R. & T.
Washbourne, 1912).
Ernest Renan, L’A%echrist (Paris: 1871). [6]
56. Moule’s position seems to reflect a cautious subscription to the early dating of
Revelation while he is – under the influence of Robinson’s analysis – moving away from
a late date advocacy: “. . neither can any part of the Apocalypse be securely given a
Domitianic date” (p. 153). “The Apocalypse maybe before A.D. 70” (p. 174).