12.07.2013 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry

by Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Response to House and Ice 353<br />

Conclusion<br />

Space fails our responding to other aspects of the argument by<br />

House and Ice. Perhaps I will develop them at more length in the<br />

book-length response to their Dominion Theolo~. Yet I believe that if<br />

anyone were to consider the few problems associated with their<br />

Chapter 12, which I have noted above, he would quickly see that as<br />

presented,‘g the argument by House and Ice is fraught with misconception<br />

and error. Though they disparage employing the “debater’s<br />

technique” of casting “doubt upon the reliability of the source,” I<br />

must confess that as far as the “Reconstruction debate” goes, I<br />

seriously question the reliability of House and Ice.<br />

69. House and Ice note that theirs is but the first of several book-length responses to<br />

Reconstructionism in the works (Dominion Tholo,g, p. 9). Perhaps they were a little too<br />

hasty jn attempting to beat the others to the punch. It may be that the other responses<br />

will be a little more careful in their presentations and will require analysis from a different<br />

perspective.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!