21.07.2013 Views

nr. 477 - 2011 - Institut for Natur, Systemer og Modeller (NSM)

nr. 477 - 2011 - Institut for Natur, Systemer og Modeller (NSM)

nr. 477 - 2011 - Institut for Natur, Systemer og Modeller (NSM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 Introduction<br />

because I had to make preparations <strong>for</strong> staying in Canada during the fall-semester, and<br />

Lars had to defend his thesis be<strong>for</strong>e the beginning of said semester, which he did on<br />

August the 31. 2009.<br />

Since then I have added new parts (chapters 11 and 12, the subsection on activation<br />

by necrotic β-cells in section 5.7 and appendices A.1, A.2, A.3 and B.6) cut out and/or<br />

replaced other parts (e.g. the bifurcation analysis of the DuCa model (section 7) has<br />

been totally redone as well as the following discussion in chapter 9) and reworked<br />

virtually the whole thesis. Nevertheless I have chosen to keep my writing in a “we<strong>for</strong>m”<br />

as opposed to an “I-<strong>for</strong>m” to honor the initial collaboration between Lars and<br />

I.<br />

The reader may wonder why so much time and space has been devoted to the analysis<br />

of the DuCa model instead of the expanded model. My answer is that: when you write<br />

a project or a thesis such as this, where you work within a time-limit, it is often the<br />

case that the most interesting work is done toward the end, thus leaving little time<br />

to incorporate and analyze discoveries that arise from said work. I have also included<br />

all the model-variations of the expanded model to illustrate how the final model came<br />

about; i.e. another insight into the work process.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!