21.07.2013 Views

nr. 477 - 2011 - Institut for Natur, Systemer og Modeller (NSM)

nr. 477 - 2011 - Institut for Natur, Systemer og Modeller (NSM)

nr. 477 - 2011 - Institut for Natur, Systemer og Modeller (NSM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.1 Fixed Points of the IM Model 55<br />

and substitute the expression <strong>for</strong> M into the two other equations. 6 So we get<br />

dMa<br />

dt<br />

dBa<br />

dt<br />

<br />

a + (k + b)Ma<br />

= f1<br />

Ba − kMa<br />

c + f1Ba<br />

<br />

a + (k + b)Ma<br />

= lMa − f1<br />

Ba − f2MaBa − dBa<br />

c + f1Ba<br />

(6.51)<br />

(6.52)<br />

Linearizing and evaluating the Jacobian Matrix of this reduced system at Ma = Ba = 0<br />

yields<br />

<br />

−k<br />

J =<br />

l<br />

f1a<br />

c<br />

− f1a<br />

<br />

c − d<br />

Which is similar to the 2 × 2 matrix shown in equation 6.24, thus the stability behavior<br />

and criteria <strong>for</strong> the healthy rest state is the same <strong>for</strong> the two dimensional system as the<br />

three dimensional system.<br />

The nullclines are found analytically by setting dMa/dt = 0 and dBa/dt = 0 in equation<br />

6.51 and 6.52 and then solving with respect to Ma (or Ba)<br />

Ma nullcline : Ma = Baf1a<br />

ck − Babf1<br />

Ba nullcline :<br />

dc + af1 + f1dBa<br />

Ma = −<br />

f2c + f1(b + k) − lf1 + f1f2Ba − lc<br />

Ba<br />

(6.53)<br />

(6.54)<br />

As it turns out, the nullcline <strong>for</strong> Ma is fairly easy to analyze whereas the nullcline <strong>for</strong><br />

Ba is a little more tricky.<br />

They both approach the point (Ba, Ma) = (0, 0). To convince oneself of this in the case<br />

of the Ba-nullcline, let Ba → 0. Then the term lc/Ba → ∞. Thus the entire fraction will<br />

approach zero as Ba → 0. Now, by differentiating the two expressions <strong>for</strong> the nullclines<br />

(equations 6.53 and 6.54) we get the slope of the Ma nullcline:<br />

and the slope of the Ba nullcline:<br />

dMa<br />

dBa<br />

dMa af1 abf<br />

=<br />

+<br />

dBa ck − bf1Ba<br />

2 1 Ba<br />

(ck − bf1Ba) 2<br />

= (cdBa + af1Ba + df1B 2 a)(f1(b + k) + cf2 − f1l + 2f1f2Ba)<br />

(f1Ba(b + k) − cl + cf2Ba − f1f2B 2 a) 2<br />

− (cd + af1 + 2df1Ba)(f1Ba(b + k) − cl + cf2Ba − f1f2B 2 a)<br />

(f1Ba(b + k) − cl + cf2Ba − f1f2B 2 a) 2<br />

(6.55)<br />

(6.56)<br />

By setting Ba = 0, the initial slope is found to be af1/ck <strong>for</strong> the Ma-nullcline and<br />

(dc+af1)/lc <strong>for</strong> the Ba-nullcline. Remember that we are working with arbitrary (positive)<br />

6 Here we are lucky enough that we are able to separate Ba from the other variables, which is not<br />

always the case. The implicit function theorem, see e.g. (Abraham et al., 1988, p.121), always tells us<br />

if such a separation is possible (in a given interval), and can be applied, if it is not apparent if it is<br />

possible to isolate one variable from the others.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!