5. Key Commodity Performance - National Agricultural and Fishery ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Post Production 6. Availability of postharvest facility at the processing plant level 7. Practically no crop insurance 8. Poor road condition in remote and marginal areas 7. Availability of warehouse space 9. High cost of mechanical drying 10. Lack of postharvest facilities at field level Marketing and Distribution 8. Established marketing channels 11. Numerous market intermediaries 9. Strong regional demand for white 12. Long distance from production to corn in the south market 10. Strong demand from the poultry and livestock industries 13. High marketing cost 11. High cornstarch manufacturing capacity Institutions 14. Drop in local prices 12. Presence of corn program 15. No continuity of corn programs (frequent change of DA leadership) 13. Strong coordination between DA- 16. Farmers not open to new RFUs and LGUs technologies due to perceived absence of government assistance 14. Establishment of PhilMaize 17. Difficulty in physically reaching out to farmers OPPORTUNITIES THREATS 1. Availability of hybrids and OPVs 1. Relative low profitability 2. Farming systems approach 2. Land conversion and crop shifting 3. Expansion under flat coconut areas 3. Lack of funds for postproduction machineries 4. Availability of technologies from 4. LGUs not prioritizing food security government and local manufacturers concerns 5. Augment rice supply in the south 5. Hesitancy of formal creditors to lend 6. Demand from snack food 6. Lack of infrastructure for quality manufacturers management 7. Development of bio-fuels e.g. corn ethanol 8. Other value added processed products Source: STRIVE and CFA-UA&P 7. Presence of substitutes 5- 18
5.3 COCONUT Production, Area, and Yield 5.3.1 Coconut production in nut terms grew moderately averaging 2.2% annually over the last twelve years. The impact of the severest El Niño was felt by the industry more in 1999 with a 9.5% production decline following another negative year in 1998. Production made a marked recovery in 2000 and continued to have modest gains in the following years. Growth over the pre- AFMA years (1993-1997) without the effect of the severe El Niño averaged 4.4% which was slightly below the growth during the post AFMA years (1999-2004) at 4.5%. 5.3.2 Area harvested has relatively remained the same over the period ranging from 3.1-3.25 million hectares. Average growth has been less than one percent over the pre and post AFMA years. Figure 5.3.1 COCONUT: Production and Area harvested, 1993-2004 Production ('M tons) 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 Source: BAS - Volume Area 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 5.3.3 In terms of indices, production improved a maximum of 17% over the 1993 figure in 1997 which was not sustained and dropped by one percent in 1999 as a result of the El Niño. On a positive note, the succeeding post-AFMA productions were all above the base year even at a slightly increasing rate. 3.30 3.25 3.20 3.15 3.10 3.05 3.00 2.95 Area harvested ('M ha) Figure 5.3.2 COCONUT: Production Index, 1993-2004 Production index (1993=100) 140 120 100 - 80 60 40 20 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 Source of basic data: BAS 5- 19
Page 1 and 2: 5. Key Commodity Performance This c
Page 3 and 4: 5.1.4 In terms of regional distribu
Page 5 and 6: Benchmarking 5.1.8 Benchmarking yie
Page 7 and 8: there is a problem with distributio
Page 9 and 10: Table 5.1.3. RICE INDUSTRY: SWOT An
Page 11 and 12: 5.2 CORN Production, Area, and Yiel
Page 13 and 14: Figure 5.2.4 CORN: Average Yield, 1
Page 15 and 16: 5.2.11 The import parity/domestic p
Page 17: 5.2.24 Feeds. There is a very big d
Page 21 and 22: Figure 5.3.4 COCONUT: Average Yield
Page 23 and 24: 5.3.11 The low farm productivity ha
Page 25 and 26: OPPORTUNITIES THREATS 1. Stable and
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5.4.3. SUGARCANE: Regional D
Page 29 and 30: Benchmarking with Relevant Asian Co
Page 31 and 32: Table 5.4.3. SUGAR INDUSTRY: SWOT A
Page 33 and 34: Figure 5.5.2. BANANA: Production In
Page 35 and 36: 5.5.7 Across regions, yield was hig
Page 37 and 38: 5.5.14 Philippine bananas commanded
Page 39 and 40: Table 5.5.3. BANANA INDUSTRY: SWOT
Page 41 and 42: 5.6 MANGO Production, Area and Yiel
Page 43 and 44: 5.6.4 Meanwhile, area planted expan
Page 45 and 46: Source of basic data: BAS and NSO B
Page 47 and 48: to cater to exports. The industry a
Page 49 and 50: Australia, South Korea, China) phyt
Page 51 and 52: 5.7.4 Relative to 1993 levels, prod
Page 53 and 54: 5.7.8 Total imports, meanwhile, hav
Page 55 and 56: SWOT Analysis 5.7.15 The main stren
Page 57 and 58: 5.8 SWINE Production 5.8.1 Producti
Page 59 and 60: 5.8.5 In terms of volume indices pe
Page 61 and 62: 5.8.11 Pork production has been for
Page 63 and 64: 5.9 BROILER Production 5.9.1 Produc
Page 65 and 66: Trade 5.9.4 Imports of chicken meat
Page 67 and 68: Table 5.9.2. BROILER: Comparative P
Page 69 and 70:
Table 5.9.3. BROILER INDUSTRY: SWOT
Page 71 and 72:
5.10.4 Chicken egg is produced main
Page 73 and 74:
5.10.9 During 1993 to 2002, India h
Page 75 and 76:
5.11 MILKFISH Production 5.11.1 Mil
Page 77 and 78:
SOCCSK- SARGEN Source of basic data
Page 79 and 80:
Table 5.11.2. MILKFISH INDUSTRY: SW
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 5.12.2. TILAPIA: Production
Page 83 and 84:
5.12.10 Meanwhile, the Philippines
Page 85 and 86:
5.13 TUNA Production 5.13.1 Total p
Page 87 and 88:
Trade 5.13.5 Total export earnings
Page 89 and 90:
Processing 3. Presence of canneries
Page 91 and 92:
5.14.3 Production is highly concent
Page 93 and 94:
Korea 240,002 194,882 194,853 Phili
Page 95:
Marketing 7. Established marketing
show all

5. Key Commodity Performance - National Agricultural and Fishery ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?