5. Key Commodity Performance - National Agricultural and Fishery ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5.6.3 The biggest regional producer of mango is the Ilocos Region, particularly the province of Pangasinan. Ilocos managed to increase its share to total production from only 30% (167,281 tons) in 1993 to 41% (399,592 tons) in 1998 and further to 44% (430,851 tons) in 2004. It used to be followed by Region IV- A, led by the province of Batangas, but was overtaken by Central Luzon in 2004 with 9%. Other big producers are Central and Western Visayas. Figure 5.6.3. MANGO: Regional Distribution of Production, 1993, 1998 and 2004 Central Visay as 8% Others 27% 1993 Total: 544,606 tons Cagay an Valley 10% Western Visay as 10% Source of basic data: BAS Western Visay as 5% Ilocos Region 30% Region IV-A Others 26% 15% Region IV-A 9% Western Visay as 5% Central Luzon 9% 2004 Total: 967,473 tons Central Visay as 6% Central Luzon 9% Others 20% 1998 Total: 994,002 tons Cagay an Valley 9% Ilocos Region 44% Region IV-A 16% Ilocos Region 41% 5- 42
5.6.4 Meanwhile, area planted expanded by 8.2% from 91,213 hectares in 1993 to 124,947 hectares in 1997. Growth decelerated to 3.9% in 1998, pulling down the average growth from 1993-1998 to 7.3%. Growth further slowed down to 3.8% per year from 132,232 hectares in 1999 to 158,943 hectares in 2004. Area expansions especially in Central Luzon, Northern Mindanao and Davao were more aggressive in 1993-1998. Back in 1993, Ilocos accounted for the biggest hectarage at 17,430 hectares, or about 19% of the total area planted to mango during the year. In 1998, it was overtaken by Central Luzon, which managed to grow its share from 14% to nearly 20%, while Ilocos’ share dropped to 16%. Central Luzon has retained the top spot since then. In 2004, it cornered 19% of the hectarage devoted to mango. 5.6.5 Meanwhile, yield improved by 7.5% per year from nearly 6 tons per hectare in 1993 to 7.9 tons in 1997. Yield dropped by 3.4% in 1998 to 7.7 tons per hectare. It continued to post a downtrend, with growth averaging 1.4% per annum from 6.6 tons per hectare in 1999 to 6.1 tons per hectare in 2004. Possibly, many of the fruits that were planted in the earlier years were just starting to bear fruit. Figure 5.6.4. MANGO: Average Yield, 1993-2004 Yield (ton/ha) 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 - Source: BAS 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 5.6.7 Yield was highest in the Ilocos Region at 20.2 tons per hectare in 2004, more than three times the national average of only 6.1 tons per hectare. The rest of the regions had yield levels below 7 tons per hectare. Trade 5- 43
Page 1 and 2: 5. Key Commodity Performance This c
Page 3 and 4: 5.1.4 In terms of regional distribu
Page 5 and 6: Benchmarking 5.1.8 Benchmarking yie
Page 7 and 8: there is a problem with distributio
Page 9 and 10: Table 5.1.3. RICE INDUSTRY: SWOT An
Page 11 and 12: 5.2 CORN Production, Area, and Yiel
Page 13 and 14: Figure 5.2.4 CORN: Average Yield, 1
Page 15 and 16: 5.2.11 The import parity/domestic p
Page 17 and 18: 5.2.24 Feeds. There is a very big d
Page 19 and 20: 5.3 COCONUT Production, Area, and Y
Page 21 and 22: Figure 5.3.4 COCONUT: Average Yield
Page 23 and 24: 5.3.11 The low farm productivity ha
Page 25 and 26: OPPORTUNITIES THREATS 1. Stable and
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5.4.3. SUGARCANE: Regional D
Page 29 and 30: Benchmarking with Relevant Asian Co
Page 31 and 32: Table 5.4.3. SUGAR INDUSTRY: SWOT A
Page 33 and 34: Figure 5.5.2. BANANA: Production In
Page 35 and 36: 5.5.7 Across regions, yield was hig
Page 37 and 38: 5.5.14 Philippine bananas commanded
Page 39 and 40: Table 5.5.3. BANANA INDUSTRY: SWOT
Page 41: 5.6 MANGO Production, Area and Yiel
Page 45 and 46: Source of basic data: BAS and NSO B
Page 47 and 48: to cater to exports. The industry a
Page 49 and 50: Australia, South Korea, China) phyt
Page 51 and 52: 5.7.4 Relative to 1993 levels, prod
Page 53 and 54: 5.7.8 Total imports, meanwhile, hav
Page 55 and 56: SWOT Analysis 5.7.15 The main stren
Page 57 and 58: 5.8 SWINE Production 5.8.1 Producti
Page 59 and 60: 5.8.5 In terms of volume indices pe
Page 61 and 62: 5.8.11 Pork production has been for
Page 63 and 64: 5.9 BROILER Production 5.9.1 Produc
Page 65 and 66: Trade 5.9.4 Imports of chicken meat
Page 67 and 68: Table 5.9.2. BROILER: Comparative P
Page 69 and 70: Table 5.9.3. BROILER INDUSTRY: SWOT
Page 71 and 72: 5.10.4 Chicken egg is produced main
Page 73 and 74: 5.10.9 During 1993 to 2002, India h
Page 75 and 76: 5.11 MILKFISH Production 5.11.1 Mil
Page 77 and 78: SOCCSK- SARGEN Source of basic data
Page 79 and 80: Table 5.11.2. MILKFISH INDUSTRY: SW
Page 81 and 82: Figure 5.12.2. TILAPIA: Production
Page 83 and 84: 5.12.10 Meanwhile, the Philippines
Page 85 and 86: 5.13 TUNA Production 5.13.1 Total p
Page 87 and 88: Trade 5.13.5 Total export earnings
Page 89 and 90: Processing 3. Presence of canneries
Page 91 and 92: 5.14.3 Production is highly concent
Page 93 and 94:
Korea 240,002 194,882 194,853 Phili
Page 95:
Marketing 7. Established marketing
show all

5. Key Commodity Performance - National Agricultural and Fishery ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?