5. Key Commodity Performance - National Agricultural and Fishery ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Source of basic data: BAS Western Others 26% Visay as 5% ARMM 7% 2004 Total: 5,631,250 tons Northern Mindanao 10% SOCCSK SARGEN 5.5.5 Meanwhile, area planted improved by 1.6% per year from nearly 326,761 hectares in 1993 to 348,648 hectares in 1997. Despite the abnormal weather conditions in 1998, area managed to grow by 1.5% to 353,707 hectares in 1998. From 1999-2004, area expansion improved to 2.2% annually reaching 414,510 hectares in 2004. Cavendish plantations are estimated to account for some 45,000 – 50,000 hectares. 5.5.6 The country’s average yield fluctuated from 1993-1998, posting its lowest level at 11.6 tons in 1998. On the average, yield grew by 2.1% per year from 1993-1997 but declined by a sharp 8.2% in 1998. From 1999-2004, yield has generally been on an uptrend, with average growth of 2.1% yearly. In 2004, yield stood at 13.6 tons per hectare. Yield levels are much higher in the Cavendish farms in Mindanao averaging about 40 tons per hectare. Figure 5.5.4. BANANA: Average Yield, 1993-2004 Yield (ton/ha) 14.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 11.5 11.0 10.5 Source: BAS 11% 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 Dav ao Region 41% 5- 34
5.5.7 Across regions, yield was highest in Davao at nearly 35 tons per hectare in 2004, nearly double the national average of 13.6 tons. It was followed by SOCCSKSARGEN at 26.1 tons per hectare. It is worth mentioning, however, that the yield levels represent averages for all varieties grown. Cavendish yield levels in Mindanao can go as high as 52 tons to 78 tons per hectare, at par with global standards. Trade 5.5.8 The Philippines is a major banana exporter. Exports, consisting of both fresh and processed bananas (i.e., chips), accounted for at least 30% of production in 2004. Fresh exports are comprised mostly of Cavendish although small volumes of lakatan and latundan are finding their way into export markets like China. 5.5.9 Fresh exports posted declines of 0.10% per annum on volume and 0.90% per annum on value from 1993-1998. Aside from abnormal weather conditions which affected supplies, growth was pulled down by the sharp drop in demand in overseas markets like Saudi Arabia, China, Hong Kong and South Korea in 1997. Exports fared relatively better in 1999-2004 with yearly growth of 6.8% and 6.6% on volume and value, respectively. In 2004, exports reached nearly 1.8 million tons valued at US$326 million. 5.5.10 The leading destination has consistently been Japan although this market has reached saturation, as evidenced by the decline in its share to total fresh Philippine exports from 65% of volume in 1993 to 51% in 2004. Other leading destinations in 2004 were Iran, China, Taiwan and United Arab Emirates. 5.5.11 Meanwhile, exports of banana chips performed better than fresh exports growing by 3% and 6.3% on volume and value, respectively, from 1993-1998. Annual growth further accelerated to 16% on volume and 14.9% on value during 1999-2004, amid strong demand in overseas markets like China. Exports amounted to 36,421 tons worth US$36.6 million in 2004. The leading markets included China, the USA, Germany, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. 5.5.12 For both fresh bananas and banana chips, the volume indices relative to 1993 levels were generally increasing from 1993-2004. The rate of increase for chips, however, is a lot faster compared to fresh, implying that more and more production are going into processing. 5- 35
Page 1 and 2: 5. Key Commodity Performance This c
Page 3 and 4: 5.1.4 In terms of regional distribu
Page 5 and 6: Benchmarking 5.1.8 Benchmarking yie
Page 7 and 8: there is a problem with distributio
Page 9 and 10: Table 5.1.3. RICE INDUSTRY: SWOT An
Page 11 and 12: 5.2 CORN Production, Area, and Yiel
Page 13 and 14: Figure 5.2.4 CORN: Average Yield, 1
Page 15 and 16: 5.2.11 The import parity/domestic p
Page 17 and 18: 5.2.24 Feeds. There is a very big d
Page 19 and 20: 5.3 COCONUT Production, Area, and Y
Page 21 and 22: Figure 5.3.4 COCONUT: Average Yield
Page 23 and 24: 5.3.11 The low farm productivity ha
Page 25 and 26: OPPORTUNITIES THREATS 1. Stable and
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5.4.3. SUGARCANE: Regional D
Page 29 and 30: Benchmarking with Relevant Asian Co
Page 31 and 32: Table 5.4.3. SUGAR INDUSTRY: SWOT A
Page 33: Figure 5.5.2. BANANA: Production In
Page 37 and 38: 5.5.14 Philippine bananas commanded
Page 39 and 40: Table 5.5.3. BANANA INDUSTRY: SWOT
Page 41 and 42: 5.6 MANGO Production, Area and Yiel
Page 43 and 44: 5.6.4 Meanwhile, area planted expan
Page 45 and 46: Source of basic data: BAS and NSO B
Page 47 and 48: to cater to exports. The industry a
Page 49 and 50: Australia, South Korea, China) phyt
Page 51 and 52: 5.7.4 Relative to 1993 levels, prod
Page 53 and 54: 5.7.8 Total imports, meanwhile, hav
Page 55 and 56: SWOT Analysis 5.7.15 The main stren
Page 57 and 58: 5.8 SWINE Production 5.8.1 Producti
Page 59 and 60: 5.8.5 In terms of volume indices pe
Page 61 and 62: 5.8.11 Pork production has been for
Page 63 and 64: 5.9 BROILER Production 5.9.1 Produc
Page 65 and 66: Trade 5.9.4 Imports of chicken meat
Page 67 and 68: Table 5.9.2. BROILER: Comparative P
Page 69 and 70: Table 5.9.3. BROILER INDUSTRY: SWOT
Page 71 and 72: 5.10.4 Chicken egg is produced main
Page 73 and 74: 5.10.9 During 1993 to 2002, India h
Page 75 and 76: 5.11 MILKFISH Production 5.11.1 Mil
Page 77 and 78: SOCCSK- SARGEN Source of basic data
Page 79 and 80: Table 5.11.2. MILKFISH INDUSTRY: SW
Page 81 and 82: Figure 5.12.2. TILAPIA: Production
Page 83 and 84: 5.12.10 Meanwhile, the Philippines
Page 85 and 86:
5.13 TUNA Production 5.13.1 Total p
Page 87 and 88:
Trade 5.13.5 Total export earnings
Page 89 and 90:
Processing 3. Presence of canneries
Page 91 and 92:
5.14.3 Production is highly concent
Page 93 and 94:
Korea 240,002 194,882 194,853 Phili
Page 95:
Marketing 7. Established marketing
show all

5. Key Commodity Performance - National Agricultural and Fishery ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?