23.07.2013 Views

May 1979 - On-Line Newspaper Archives of Ocean City

May 1979 - On-Line Newspaper Archives of Ocean City

May 1979 - On-Line Newspaper Archives of Ocean City

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

editorials/comment<br />

Halt dual <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

Holding other municipal elective<br />

ffices has become the rule rather<br />

tan the exception on the Cape <strong>May</strong><br />

ity Board <strong>of</strong> Freeholders over<br />

le years and, other than at election<br />

le, very little public debate has<br />

focused on this issue.<br />

<strong>On</strong>e has to question how a person<br />

devote the time necessary to<br />

ev"than one political <strong>of</strong>fice,<br />

icularly if he must also keep up<br />

the demands <strong>of</strong> a job or<br />

less.<br />

Bjeyond this,<br />

I Jersey Common however, New<br />

Cause points out<br />

I that "there is a clear conflict <strong>of</strong><br />

I interest" in this situation when<br />

|act(ons are taken by the freeholder<br />

I board which directly or indirectly<br />

I relate to the municipality in which a<br />

I freeholder holds elective <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

( is now possible that the state<br />

(Legislature could pass a law<br />

ibiting a person in New Jersey<br />

i holding more than one state,<br />

| county or municipal elective <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

This bill has already passed the<br />

Assembly and is currently under<br />

consideration in the Senate County<br />

and Municipal Government Com-<br />

mittee where, according to Common<br />

Cause, Sen. James S. Cafiero (R-<br />

Cape <strong>May</strong>-Cumberland) holds a<br />

critical vote.<br />

The Sentinel-Ledger spoke with<br />

one <strong>of</strong> Cafiero's aides last week who<br />

said he was unfamiliar with the<br />

senator's position on this issue.<br />

Cafiero has yet to declare his<br />

9ition to either the Sentinel-<br />

jer or Common Cause.<br />

This bill is needed to curb the<br />

practice both at the county level and<br />

in the Legislature in Trenton.<br />

Meeting only on a part-time basis, it<br />

is difficult enough for the<br />

freeholders or legislators to cope<br />

with the issues <strong>of</strong> one governmental<br />

body without having to keep abreast<br />

<strong>of</strong> problems at another level as well.<br />

The Sentinel-Ledger hopes that<br />

Sen. Cafiero will not only support<br />

this bill but will lobby for its passage<br />

both in his committee ana on the<br />

floor <strong>of</strong> the Senate.<br />

More sunshine needed<br />

Page Two, Section Two<br />

Thursday, <strong>May</strong> 17,<strong>1979</strong><br />

The oil crisis<br />

from the view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the company<br />

ByTOMHALLIGAN<br />

Mobil Oil Corporation<br />

placed an advertisement in a<br />

recent edition <strong>of</strong> Editor and<br />

Publisher magazine stating,<br />

"We're willing to comment on<br />

our critics' views, fill in<br />

reporters on the facts about<br />

oil industry issues, even<br />

tangle with those who'd like to<br />

take a swipe at us. So when<br />

you think <strong>of</strong> oil, think <strong>of</strong> us.<br />

And when you think First<br />

Amendment, call us, too.<br />

We're rabid on the rights <strong>of</strong><br />

companies to speak their<br />

piece."<br />

Hie advertisement listed a<br />

telephone number and two<br />

names <strong>of</strong> company<br />

representatives where<br />

reporters could call "to get a<br />

big mouth" to answer<br />

questions.<br />

Well, I decided to give Mobil<br />

a call. It seems to me that<br />

most Americans have as<br />

many different ideas, theories<br />

and hunches as to why there is<br />

The possibility that <strong>Ocean</strong> <strong>City</strong><br />

idl met in contravention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

afe Open Public Meetings Act<br />

|(sunshine law) came to light<br />

atly following a closed meeting<br />

iween council and <strong>May</strong>or Chester<br />

|J. Wimberg to try and work out a<br />

apromise over the appointment<br />

municipal judge.<br />

I tibundl President<br />

IWfods admitted that,<br />

no( only the public but; also city'<br />

Clerk Loretta C. Marshall and<br />

Solicitor Gerald J. Corcoran to<br />

leave the chambers, neither council<br />

oat Wimberg bothered to take notes<br />

or keep a record <strong>of</strong> the meeting's<br />

'ceedings, something that is<br />

ally required by the sun-<br />

law.<br />

Woods maintained that this was<br />

|an;innocenl oversight and there is<br />

|no ^evidence to suggest otherwise.<br />

Ijbwever, this does not discount<br />

Ithe, serious nature <strong>of</strong> this oversight.<br />

line reason records are kept <strong>of</strong> those<br />

Imefetings which can legally be held<br />

Ibehind closed doors is to insure that<br />

latter the matter under con-<br />

Isideration is concluded the records<br />

|cajp be scrutinized by the public.<br />

Ip • this case, for example,<br />

idipal Judge Edward P. Koz-<br />

t,-whose fate was under con-<br />

bfation at the meeting, may have<br />

1 to inspect the records <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ig to defend both his<br />

ion and position, which is his<br />

Iright;<br />

This council has endeavored to<br />

open in its actions and to be ac-<br />

countable to its constituency and<br />

thus no one can justifiably imply<br />

any devious intent to the apparent<br />

sunshine law infraction.<br />

This is, however, the second time<br />

council apparently inadvertantly<br />

4jol

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!