25.07.2013 Views

Trade and Commercial Law Assessment - Honduras - Economic ...

Trade and Commercial Law Assessment - Honduras - Economic ...

Trade and Commercial Law Assessment - Honduras - Economic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRADE AND COMMERCIAL LAW ASSESSMENT DECEMBER 2004<br />

HONDURAS<br />

IX. COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY<br />

A. INTRODUCTION<br />

Recognizing the benefits of a competition law <strong>and</strong> policy, the Government of <strong>Honduras</strong> has<br />

engaged in significant efforts to adopt a competition law. 150 Substantial initial efforts began in<br />

2001, with renewed interest <strong>and</strong> activity in 2003. Since the end of 2003, momentum has<br />

increased significantly. The well-publicized anticompetitive practices in the cement sector during<br />

the past year, combined with pressures created by CAFTA preparations <strong>and</strong> related internal <strong>and</strong><br />

external concern about the lack of a competition law, have all driven forward the process of<br />

adopting a competition law. In September 2004, a draft competition law was “officiated” <strong>and</strong><br />

submitted to the <strong>Economic</strong>s Committee of the Legislative Assembly. It is anticipated that this<br />

draft law will be voted on before the end of 2004.<br />

B. LEGAL FRAMEWORK<br />

No competition law exists in <strong>Honduras</strong>; however, certain laws have competition-related<br />

provisions, many of which are comprehensive. Article 339 of the Honduran constitution<br />

prohibits monopolies <strong>and</strong> oligopolies. Articles 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 of the <strong>Commercial</strong> Code address unfair<br />

competition, described as competition undertaken by merchants wherein a merchant unduly<br />

attracts the clientele of a competitor. The Consumer Protection <strong>Law</strong> (<strong>and</strong> the accompanying<br />

implementing regulation of July 25, 1989) has numerous competition-related provisions. Article<br />

5 provides the basis for a competition law, stating that all goods <strong>and</strong> services offered in the<br />

national territory must comply with conditions of just retribution with respect to quality,<br />

quantity, <strong>and</strong> efficiency in the prices paid by the consumer. In Article 29B of the Consumer<br />

Protection <strong>Law</strong>, the executive branch is empowered not only to adopt any measures necessary<br />

for preventing or combating unfair competition but also to stop any activities that unfairly restrict<br />

or limit the delivery of products or services or affect price. Specific examples within this law<br />

include Article 7, which states that a producer cannot condition the sale of one product on the<br />

acquisition of another product. In the implementing regulation of the consumer protection law,<br />

Article 41 authorizes the executive branch to issue any other measures necessary for controlling<br />

150 Competition law provides a regulatory framework for maintaining <strong>and</strong> improving efficiency in markets,<br />

promoting competitive pricing practices, <strong>and</strong> restraining price rises in markets where competition is affected by<br />

anticompetitive business practices (including horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical restraints [e.g., collusive price-fixing,<br />

input/output allocation, bid rigging], abuse of dominant position [e.g., exclusion, discrimination, predation], <strong>and</strong><br />

certain mergers <strong>and</strong> acquisitions). Competition law alone does not create competition, but when effectively<br />

applied can counteract the dangers of private anticompetitive behavior. For example, cartels may deliberately<br />

create artificial shortages, resulting in some consumers’ being able to obtain the product but others’ paying an<br />

inflated, or monopoly, price. Dominant firms may abuse their market power by, for example, tying two products<br />

without a legitimate business purpose. Firms with market power that erect protectionist barriers may block entry<br />

to new participants.<br />

In addition to private conduct, competition law can be used to counteract inefficient government regulation <strong>and</strong><br />

promote efficiency within the public sector. Competition authorities can use the competition law to perform a<br />

comprehensive review of existing <strong>and</strong> proposed laws <strong>and</strong> regulations, providing suggestions <strong>and</strong> advice on<br />

government policies <strong>and</strong> measures that promote anticompetitive practices or inefficiencies. Activities often<br />

include the review of possible sources of public restraints on competition in trade policies (tariff <strong>and</strong> non-tariff<br />

barriers, antidumping duties <strong>and</strong> discriminatory export practices), investment policies (exclusionary lists,<br />

ownership restrictions, licensing requirements), <strong>and</strong> sectoral regulation (power, transportation,<br />

telecommunications, natural monopolies).<br />

IX-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!