26.07.2013 Views

Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education

Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education

Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

portions of core academic courses taught by highly<br />

qualified teachers than is prevalent in the district.<br />

Middle School ELA and Math Pass Rates in<br />

Schools of Different Characteristics<br />

The differences in ELA pass rates among LEP students<br />

in different types of schools are statistically<br />

significant in relation to the size, poverty rate, and<br />

LEP density of the schools, and to their accountability<br />

status. LEP students’ middle school ELA pass<br />

rates are higher when they are enrolled:<br />

• in large middle schools;<br />

• in schools with lower poverty rates;<br />

• in schools with a high LEP density; and,<br />

! • in schools that met AYP goals in ELA.<br />

Differences in Math pass rates among LEP students<br />

are significant in regard to school size, school poverty<br />

rate, the density of LEP students, the school’s<br />

accountability status, the proportion of teachers<br />

licensed in teaching assignment, and the proportion<br />

of courses taught by highly qualified teachers.<br />

LEP students showed higher MCAS Math pass rates<br />

when they were enrolled in large middle schools,<br />

in schools with lower poverty rates, in schools that<br />

met AYP goals in ELA and Math, and in schools<br />

with teacher qualifications at or below the district<br />

average.<br />

Table 42. Middle School MCAS Pass Rates of LEP Students in Schools with Different Characteristics. BPS, SY2009<br />

LEP MCAS Pass Rates<br />

ELA3 Math4 EP 90.3% 65.6%<br />

All LEP 59.0% 37.3%<br />

School Size<br />

Large 100% 100%<br />

Medium 56.9% 32.7%<br />

Small 61.7% 45.4%<br />

Poverty Rate<br />

Poverty rate 25-75% 86.4% 67.6%<br />

Poverty rate >75% 57.7% 36.4%<br />

LEP Density<br />

0-10% 67.0% 48.9%<br />

10.1-30% 59.3% 41.0%<br />

30.1-50% 54.6% 25.7%<br />

>50% 78.3% 43.5%<br />

Accountability Status1 Met AYP in ELA 68.0% 49.3%<br />

Did not meet AYP in ELA 56.2% 34.2%<br />

Met AYP in Math 62.6% 55.6%<br />

Did not meet AYP in Math 58.3% 34.5%<br />

Teacher Qualifications2 % of teachers licensed in teaching assignment, above district average<br />

(>97.9%)<br />

61.4% 34.9%<br />

% of teachers licensed in teaching assignment, at or below district<br />

average (95.9%)<br />

58.1% 35.1%<br />

% of core academic classes taught by highly qualified teachers, at or<br />

below district average (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!