View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
•<br />
1.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
CHAPTER 1<br />
Rehabilitation is the word used to descnbe ways <strong>of</strong> helping those with disabilities to<br />
become fully participating members <strong>of</strong> society, with access to all benefits and<br />
opportunities <strong>of</strong>that society (Mbeki, 1997:26). It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong>the Government<br />
to make sure that the disabled are well rehabilitated by providing all facilities and health<br />
services that they need. This is made possible through community development<br />
programmes, welfare organizations as well as provincial and local authorities (VIole,<br />
1993: 205).<br />
The National Health Care Delivery System aims at moving away from long term<br />
institutionalization <strong>of</strong> disabled patients to a short term stay during resuscitation, with<br />
health care to be continued in the community (ANC, WHO & UNICEF, 1994:75). This<br />
enables individuals to use theirremaining capabilities through rehabilitation.<br />
The amputees especially experience many problems in the community, <strong>of</strong>ten caused by<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> proper discharge planning, lack <strong>of</strong>adequate information about the care <strong>of</strong> their<br />
stumpsand lack <strong>of</strong>community-based resources. Examples <strong>of</strong>these problems are pressure<br />
sores on the stump, flexion contructures due to poor positioning, or poorly fitting<br />
prosthesis due to improper shaping<strong>of</strong>the stump (Kubheka & Uys, 1995:45).<br />
McNett (1991:250) states that from fifty amputees discharged within three years from<br />
urban rehabilitation facilities, ten were wheelchair bound and functionally effective. With<br />
.<br />
theremaining forty, ten were using prostheses and crutches and were coping effectively.<br />
This includes all aspects, that is physical, psychosocial and vocationally.<br />
McNett(I991:251) indicates that available social support was ineffectively utilized due to<br />
lack<strong>of</strong>knowledge and poor community reintegration. This means that from this study,<br />
only 20%<strong>of</strong>amputees were productive and successfully rehabilitated. Itwould seem that,<br />
1