View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.4.3 ITLl\f 9 CATEGORIES OF PERSONNEL INVOLYED IN<br />
REHABILIATION OF AMPUTEES<br />
The inclusion <strong>of</strong>this item was to find out whether the respondents were seen by all the<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the rehabilitation team. This will help in determining whether the health<br />
services attended by the respondents do have all the members <strong>of</strong>the rehabilitation team<br />
or not<br />
TABLE 5.7 REHABILITATION CATEGORIES<br />
Rehabilitation Team Categories Frequency Percentage<br />
Physiotherapist 20 80<br />
Occupational Therapist 20 80<br />
Social Worker 20 80<br />
Psychiatrist 2 8<br />
Psychologist 2 8<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation Counsellor 1 4<br />
Rehabilitation Nurse 2 8<br />
Table 5.7 shows that (20) 80% <strong>of</strong> respondents were seen by the occupational therapist,<br />
(20) 80% by the physiotherapist, (20) 80% by the social worker, (2) 8% by the<br />
psychologist, (2) 8% by the psychiatrist and (2) 8% by the rehabilitation nurse in the<br />
private sector, as compared to (1) 4% by the vocational rehabilitation councilor. This<br />
reveals that there are not adeqnate rehabilitation nurses and vocational counselors in<br />
either government hospitals on in the private sector as the only three amputees attended<br />
by these two members were from the private sector, with the result that most amputees<br />
are left unattended or not properly attended to.<br />
This also shows that the only rehabilitation team members available in government health<br />
services are the physiotherapist, the occupational therapist and social workers, as almost<br />
all the respondents were seen by these categories <strong>of</strong>personnel. These respondents were<br />
also seen by all other health personnel who do not fall under the category <strong>of</strong> the<br />
47