The Economic Impact of the UK Film Industry - BFI - British Film ...
The Economic Impact of the UK Film Industry - BFI - British Film ...
The Economic Impact of the UK Film Industry - BFI - British Film ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8.3. O<strong>the</strong>r evidence on <strong>the</strong> cultural value <strong>of</strong> <strong>UK</strong> film<br />
<strong>Economic</strong> Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Film</strong> <strong>Industry</strong><br />
July 2007<br />
Looking at box <strong>of</strong>fice revenue data <strong>the</strong>refore suggests that films with <strong>UK</strong> content are valued significantly<br />
by <strong>the</strong> film-going public. But, as discussed above, <strong>the</strong> full cultural value that people place on <strong>UK</strong> film may<br />
not be reflected in box <strong>of</strong>fice revenues. It is conceivable that <strong>the</strong> total cultural value placed on film could<br />
exceed that reflected in box <strong>of</strong>fice revenues owing to significant so-called ‘consumer surplus’ – where<br />
consumers value a service more highly than <strong>the</strong> price <strong>the</strong>y have to pay for it - and externalities from such<br />
things as national self-esteem and identity.<br />
One common approach to establishing <strong>the</strong> total value <strong>of</strong> cultural activities is to conduct surveys that ask<br />
people directly. A traditional survey was commissioned by <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Film</strong> Council from Omnimas on ‘Public<br />
Attitude to <strong>Film</strong> on TV’. Over three-quarters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample indicated that <strong>the</strong>y consider films on television<br />
an enjoyable activity, with younger groups more likely to agree. Over one-third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample thought<br />
<strong>the</strong>re should be more films on television, with only 5% believing <strong>the</strong>re were too many. So, <strong>the</strong> survey<br />
found people placed a high valuation on film relative to o<strong>the</strong>r forms <strong>of</strong> visual entertainment. But, fur<strong>the</strong>r to<br />
this, <strong>the</strong> survey found clear support for <strong>UK</strong> film. About 81% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey agreed that television companies<br />
should support <strong>the</strong> <strong>British</strong> film industry by showing more <strong>UK</strong>-made films, and 77% agreed that <strong>UK</strong> films<br />
are an important part <strong>of</strong> <strong>British</strong> heritage. This is clear evidence that people place an extra value on <strong>the</strong><br />
cultural content <strong>of</strong> <strong>UK</strong> film.<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r, more sophisticated, approach to establishing value involves conducting ‘contingent valuation’<br />
surveys. <strong>The</strong>se surveys vary in form but, in essence, ask people a structured set <strong>of</strong> questions that seek to<br />
draw out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> cash value <strong>the</strong>y attach to a particular subject. <strong>The</strong>re has not been a large survey on<br />
<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> core <strong>UK</strong> film industry <strong>of</strong> this sort. But <strong>the</strong>re have been a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r studies that may<br />
help inform an estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall cultural value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industry:<br />
• <strong>The</strong> BBC is a similar institution to <strong>the</strong> core <strong>UK</strong> film industry in that it provides a key outlet for <strong>UK</strong>originated<br />
cultural content. <strong>The</strong> Corporation undertook a contingent valuation study 34 using a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> survey types in its submission to <strong>the</strong> Independent Panel on its charter review in October 2004. <strong>The</strong><br />
study revealed an overwhelming support for <strong>the</strong> BBC across <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>, with 81% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population<br />
agreeing that <strong>the</strong> BBC is worth <strong>the</strong> licence fee cost <strong>of</strong> £121 per year. On average, people valued <strong>the</strong><br />
BBC at around twice <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> licence fee, that is £20 a month or £240 a year. Given <strong>the</strong><br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>UK</strong>-specific content on <strong>the</strong> BBC compared to that available on o<strong>the</strong>r broadcasters,<br />
this provides evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high valuation placed on <strong>UK</strong>-originated audiovisual content. In fact, <strong>the</strong><br />
highest valuation on <strong>the</strong> BBC was placed by those with multi-channel television - suggesting that <strong>UK</strong><br />
cultural content was particularly highly valued where <strong>the</strong>re were alternatives.<br />
• Ano<strong>the</strong>r contingent valuation study 35 looked at <strong>the</strong> benefits that <strong>the</strong> Australian community derived<br />
from having <strong>the</strong> mandatory transmission <strong>of</strong> Australian-originated programmes on <strong>the</strong>ir television<br />
34<br />
Fauth, R, Horner, L, Mahdon, M and Bevan, S, (2006), ‘Willingness to pay for <strong>the</strong> BBC during <strong>the</strong> next Charter period: A report<br />
prepared for <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Culture, Media and Sport’, September.<br />
35<br />
Papandrea, F, (1999), ‘Willingness to pay for domestic television programming’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Cultural <strong>Economic</strong>s, Vol. 23, No. 3,<br />
pages 147-164, August.<br />
54