08.08.2013 Views

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>An</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> NEMIZ<br />

<strong>Mission</strong> Coalition <strong>for</strong> Economic Justice & Jobs<br />

III.28 IPZ Literature Review & Case Studies<br />

space” (R:121). Funds generated by <strong>the</strong> TIF can be used to back bonds that<br />

provide below-market loans and grants to remaining manufacturers, maintaining<br />

a balance of uses in mixed-use areas, especially in <strong>the</strong> face of increasing<br />

property values (R:134). It is also important to gear <strong>the</strong>se programs<br />

toward manufacturers who rent space, and not just to those who own<br />

(R:129).<br />

The study’s recommendations are intended to “identify criteria <strong>for</strong> determining<br />

which areas presently zoned <strong>for</strong> manufacturing are suitable <strong>for</strong> rezoning<br />

to o<strong>the</strong>r uses, which should be retained, and which should be considered<br />

<strong>for</strong> Mixed-use (non-transitional) and Mixed-use (transitional) <strong>Zone</strong>s.<br />

Included is a proposal to create Manufacturing Development <strong>Zone</strong>s in<br />

which manufacturing uses would be given extra protection and support” (R<br />

113).<br />

Exit Interviews<br />

As part of this ef<strong>for</strong>t, we attempted to interview industrial business that have<br />

recently left San Francisco or are considering leaving. The 26 firms listed<br />

below were contacted; most of <strong>the</strong>m have already moved out of <strong>the</strong> City. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se firms, four agreed to be interviewed and answered a series of questions<br />

(see Appendix A <strong>for</strong> questionnaire). A handful of firms chose not to participate<br />

in an interview but provided some general indication of why <strong>the</strong>y left.<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> reason <strong>for</strong> moving was <strong>the</strong> cost of doing business in <strong>the</strong> City.<br />

Particular mention was made of <strong>the</strong> City’s payroll tax, which is a hardship<br />

<strong>for</strong> smaller businesses. Some firms moved to be closer to <strong>the</strong>ir customers.<br />

Atlas Heating Odwalla Juice<br />

Bebe Clothing O'Keefe Manufacturing<br />

Berkeley Farms O'Neill Wet Suits<br />

BiRight Food Service Petrini Van and Storage<br />

Boland Trucking Pribuss Engineering, Inc.<br />

BR Funston R&R French Bro<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Coca Cola Syrup Plant San Francisco Pipe and Tube<br />

Essential Elements San Pacific Imports<br />

Flynn and Enslow Sidney Davis Fabrics<br />

Info Image Snyder Newall<br />

Just Desserts Super Shuttle<br />

Loomis Fargo Armed Car Swiss American Sausage<br />

McCune Audio Visual Xpedex Paper<br />

Escalating rents were also mentioned as an important reason <strong>for</strong> leaving <strong>the</strong><br />

City. One business mentioned harassment of employees by homeless people.<br />

When asked what <strong>the</strong> City could have done to keep <strong>the</strong> business in SF, protective<br />

zoning was not mentioned, but reducing payroll taxes and assisting<br />

landlords with building code compliance were cited. Two businesses mentioned<br />

that <strong>the</strong>ir SF building needed repairs and that <strong>the</strong> landlords would<br />

not make improvements, because of costs and concerns about code compliance<br />

of existing improvements.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!