08.08.2013 Views

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Mission</strong> Coalition <strong>for</strong> Economic Justice & Jobs (MCEJJ)<br />

that <strong>the</strong> neighborhood did not have enough parking to serve its users. <strong>An</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r participant, however, felt that<br />

qualifiers needed to be in place in order to avoid creating a suburban character in <strong>the</strong> neighborhood. The goal<br />

was fur<strong>the</strong>r specified to introduce <strong>the</strong> concept of parking facilities that would be in keeping with encouraging<br />

a pedestrian-oriented character in <strong>the</strong> neighborhood and <strong>the</strong> fact that it is well-served by transit.<br />

Finally, physical improvements such as planting street trees and installing o<strong>the</strong>r pedestrian amenities along<br />

streets, particularly along 16 th<br />

, 17 th<br />

, and 20 th<br />

Streets was unanimously agreed upon by <strong>the</strong> group to create a<br />

more pedestrian-friendly environment that would connect <strong>the</strong> neighborhood to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> District. A<br />

couple of group members felt that <strong>the</strong>se improvements could be used to create corridors that connected both<br />

existing open space and cultural amenities.<br />

Final Goals<br />

The group did not finalize <strong>the</strong>ir goals into main points. Also, with <strong>the</strong> short amount of time left, <strong>the</strong> group<br />

did not get far in proposing o<strong>the</strong>r implementation tools. Many participants were not familiar enough with<br />

implementation. However, a suggestion was made to use development bonuses, which would allow developers<br />

greater densities in exchange <strong>for</strong> providing o<strong>the</strong>r amenities such as open space. In response to this one<br />

member suggested discussing densities, but this did not go fur<strong>the</strong>r. Finally, tax breaks were suggested, but<br />

were not specified as to what types and how <strong>the</strong>y would assist in carrying out <strong>the</strong>ir goals. The group was not<br />

amenable to improvement districts or parking districts.<br />

Appendix A.20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!