08.08.2013 Views

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

An Alternative Future for the North East Mission Industrial Zone

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Additional issues include that came out of this process include:<br />

<strong>Mission</strong> Coalition <strong>for</strong> Economic Justice & Jobs (MCEJJ)<br />

Need to retain some flexibility in development option in to ride out changes in economic times;<br />

Need to provide a diversity of housing options in <strong>the</strong> area;<br />

Need periodic review of planning/zoning <strong>for</strong> a more proactive (less reactive) approach;<br />

NEMIZ residents/owners etc need more representation/voice in planning <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mission</strong>; and,<br />

NEMIZ is important to <strong>Mission</strong> and San Francisco.<br />

The group selected <strong>the</strong> following as <strong>the</strong> primary issues in to consider in planning in <strong>the</strong> NEMIZ:<br />

The NEMIZ should be a mixed-use neighborhood with more jobs generally in addition to <strong>the</strong><br />

preservation of PDR jobs and more housing<br />

Majority concern over zoning existing uses as “non-con<strong>for</strong>ming”: existing uses need to be<br />

acknowledged, not ignored.<br />

Majority agreement that zoning alone can’t guarantee #1 objectives<br />

Economic development incentives including permits, taxes, job training programs, impact fees,<br />

and/or parking requirements are also needed<br />

Majority agreement to create a NEMIZ special use district that includes a mix of uses tied to clearly<br />

defined jobs/housing objectives. New projects are subject to a discretionary review by <strong>the</strong> planning<br />

commission <strong>for</strong> en<strong>for</strong>cement of “intent” (minority dissent that discretionary review has no teeth)<br />

Buffer zones are preferred but are not always realistic given existing land uses where residential uses<br />

are often adjacent to core PDR uses.<br />

Establish Zoning <strong>for</strong> NEMIZ<br />

Due to lack of time and diminished focus, <strong>the</strong> group did not come to a fully conclusive proposal <strong>for</strong> rezoning<br />

<strong>the</strong> NEMIZ. The following are points that seemed to be supported by all:<br />

Public Institutions, Facilities and Utilities should be removed from <strong>the</strong> examination process, as <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

unlikely to change. (Brown “X”)<br />

Existing “Core PDR” use should be protected with something like and IPZ. (This area is represented in<br />

Blue and is generally north of 16 h and east of Florida in addition to <strong>the</strong> parcels at Alameda & Florida<br />

owned by Byers Clothing)<br />

Transitional uses should surround core PDR uses (Orange)<br />

The tail of NEMIZ should be zoned to tie into <strong>the</strong> fabric of <strong>the</strong> existing residential and neighborhood<br />

commercial neighborhood surrounding it. (Yellow)<br />

Existing Large Big-box Retail uses should be brought into con<strong>for</strong>mity by zoning <strong>the</strong>m Community<br />

Commercial. Potential sites <strong>for</strong> additional big box development north of 14 th street should not be a<br />

problem so long as <strong>the</strong>y do not threaten core PDR uses. (Red)<br />

What land remains should be considered as a Special Use District which would be subject to discretionary<br />

review aided by a set of land use and design guidelines that represent <strong>the</strong> “intent” to keep <strong>the</strong> NEMIZ’<br />

unique, mixed-use industrial feel. One individual pointed out that discretionary review may lack <strong>the</strong> “teeth”<br />

to regulate development in this fashion. O<strong>the</strong>r agreed, but wished to pursue <strong>the</strong> special use district concept<br />

anyway, providing that additional incentives and tools should be considered to give <strong>the</strong> “intent” <strong>the</strong> teeth it<br />

needs. This dissenting opinion did not feel that additional incentives would be enough, stating that<br />

ultimately zoning would determine <strong>the</strong> future land uses in <strong>the</strong> NEMIZ.<br />

Appendix A.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!