Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs
Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs
Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Section 4.3. Covering supermodular functions by <strong>directed</strong> <strong>hypergraphs</strong> 77<br />
if <strong>and</strong> only if<br />
hold for every partition F <strong>of</strong> V .<br />
γ ≥ <br />
p(X), (4.7)<br />
X∈F<br />
rγ ≥ <br />
p(V − X), (4.8)<br />
X∈F<br />
(|F| − 1) γ ≥ <br />
p(V − X) (4.9)<br />
X∈F<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. The necessity <strong>of</strong> the conditions can be seen easily. To prove sufficiency, one can<br />
construct degree specifications mi <strong>and</strong> mo that satisfy the conditions <strong>of</strong> Theorem 4.5. Let<br />
us define the set function p ′ by p ′ (X) := p(X) for X ⊂ V <strong>and</strong> p ′ (V ) := γ. Then p ′ is<br />
positively crossing supermodular. Since (4.7) <strong>and</strong> (4.9) hold for p ′ , by applying Theorem<br />
2.13 to p ′ we get a nonnegative integer vector mi such that mi(X) ≥ p(X) for all X ⊆ V ,<br />
<strong>and</strong> mi(V ) = γ.<br />
To construct mo let m ′ o be a nonnegative vector satisfying m ′ o(V − X) ≥ p(X) for<br />
all X ⊆ V , which is minimal in the sense that for every v ∈ V with m ′ o(v) > 0 there<br />
exists a set X for which v /∈ X <strong>and</strong> m ′ o(V − X) = p(X) (such a set is called tight). Let<br />
B = {X1, X2, . . . , Xl} be a family <strong>of</strong> minimum cardinality which for every node v with<br />
m ′ o(v) > 0 contains a tight set not containing v. Then B is cross-free, since we could<br />
replace a crossing pair Xi, Xj by their intersection according to (2.2). If the family is<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> co-disjoint sets, then<br />
m ′ o(V ) =<br />
l<br />
m ′ o(V − Xi) =<br />
i=1<br />
l<br />
p(Xi) ≤ rγ<br />
by (4.8). If there are two disjoint sets Xi <strong>and</strong> Xj in B, then<br />
m ′ o(V ) ≤ m ′ o(V − Xi) + m ′ o(V − Xj) = p(Xi) + p(Xj) ≤ γ.<br />
Thus we can obtain an out-degree specification mo by increasing m ′ o on an arbitrary node<br />
to obtain mo(V ) = rγ. By Theorem 4.5 there is a <strong>directed</strong> (r, 1)-hypergraph with degrees<br />
mi <strong>and</strong> mo that covers p.<br />
The following example demonstrates that condition (4.9) cannot be left out. Let V =<br />
{v1, v2, v3}, p({v1, v2}) = p({v1, v3}) = p({v2, v3}) := 2 <strong>and</strong> p(X) := 0 for the other sets,<br />
r := 3, γ := 2. Conditions (4.7) <strong>and</strong> (4.8) are satisfied, but (4.9) is not, <strong>and</strong> there is no<br />
<strong>directed</strong> (3, 1)-hypergraph <strong>of</strong> 2 hyperarcs covering p. When r = 1, i.e. we add digraph<br />
edges, (4.9) follows from (4.8).<br />
i=1