22.08.2013 Views

Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs

Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs

Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 5.2. Tree-reducible <strong>hypergraphs</strong> 85<br />

(a)<br />

Figure 5.1: (a) a wooded hypergraph; (b) a tree-reducible hypergraph<br />

1.5 may be easily derived from Edmonds’ matroid partition theorem (Theorem 2.7). Our<br />

approach for <strong>hypergraphs</strong> also makes use <strong>of</strong> this result <strong>and</strong> is based on an observation <strong>of</strong><br />

Lorea [54] that the notion <strong>of</strong> circuit matroids <strong>of</strong> graphs can be generalized to <strong>hypergraphs</strong>.<br />

We elaborate this in the next section, by introducing the structures that play a role similar<br />

to spanning trees in graphs.<br />

5.2 Tree-reducible <strong>hypergraphs</strong><br />

We call a hypergraph H = (V, E) forest-reducible or wooded if it is possible to select two<br />

nodes from each hyperedge <strong>of</strong> H so that the chosen pairs, as graph edges, form a forest<br />

(Figure 5.1). If this forest may be chosen to be a spanning tree, then H is called tree-<br />

reducible. Clearly a tree-reducible hypergraph is partition-connected. We will prove that<br />

every partition-connected hypergraph contains a tree-reducible sub-hypergraph, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> these sub-<strong>hypergraphs</strong> is similar to the role <strong>of</strong> spanning trees <strong>of</strong> graphs with respect<br />

to k-partition-<strong>connectivity</strong>. First we need some additional definitions.<br />

5.2.1 Hyperforests <strong>and</strong> the hypergraphic matroid<br />

Given a hypergraph H = (V, E), we can define b : 2 E → Z+ as b(X ) := | ∪ (X )| for every<br />

X ⊆ E. It is easy to see that b is fully submodular on the ground set E. We say that the<br />

strong Hall condition holds for the hypergraph H if |∪(X )| ≥ |X |+1 for every ∅ = X ⊆ E.<br />

It should be remarked that the notion comes from the theory <strong>of</strong> bipartite graphs: a<br />

bipartite graph G = (U, V ; E) satisfies the strong Hall condition for U if |Γ(X)| ≥ |X| + 1<br />

for every ∅ = X ⊆ U, where Γ(X) = {v ∈ V : uv ∈ E for some u ∈ X}. There is a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard way <strong>of</strong> associating a bipartite graph G = (U, V ; E) to a hypergraph H = (V, E)<br />

by setting U := E, <strong>and</strong> for e ∈ U <strong>and</strong> v ∈ V , ev ∈ E if <strong>and</strong> only if v ∈ e. Thus the<br />

strong Hall condition for the hypergraph corresponds to the strong Hall condition for the<br />

associated bipartite graph.<br />

(b)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!