22.08.2013 Views

Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs

Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs

Edge-connectivity of undirected and directed hypergraphs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 Chapter 5. Partition-<strong>connectivity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>hypergraphs</strong><br />

A subpartition where the minimum is attained will be called a minimizer <strong>of</strong> (5.3). Let<br />

N := {Z1, . . . , Zt} be a minimizer <strong>of</strong> (5.3) so that |N | is as small as possible.<br />

We claim that (∪(Zi)) ∩ (∪(Zj)) = ∅ holds whenever 1 ≤ i < j ≤ t. Indeed, (∪(Zi)) ∩<br />

(∪(Zj)) = ∅ would imply | ∪ (Zi ∪ Zj)| ≤ | ∪ (Zi)| + | ∪ (Zj)| − 1, <strong>and</strong> hence bH(Zi ∪ Zj) ≤<br />

bH(Zi) + bH(Zj). This is however impossible since by replacing Zi <strong>and</strong> Zj in N by their<br />

union we would obtain another minimizer subpartition N ′ <strong>of</strong> E for which |N ′ | < |N |.<br />

We claim furthermore that e ⊆ ∪(Zi) for every hyperedge e ∈ E − ∪ t i=1Zi. If we had<br />

e ⊆ ∪(Zi), then by replacing Zi by Z ′ i := Zi + e we would obtain a subpartition N ′ <strong>of</strong> E<br />

for which <br />

Z∈N ′ <br />

bH(Z) + |E − ∪Z∈N ′Z| < Z∈N bH(Z) + |E − ∪Z∈N Z| contradicting the<br />

fact that N is a minimizer.<br />

Let F be the following partition <strong>of</strong> V . For each member Zi <strong>of</strong> N , let ∪(Zi) be a<br />

member <strong>of</strong> F, <strong>and</strong> for each element v ∈ V − ∪ t i=1 ∪ (Zi), let {v} be a member <strong>of</strong> F. By<br />

the claims above eE(F) = |E − ∪ t i=1Zi|. Thus rH(E) = t<br />

i=1 bH(Zi) + |E − ∪ t i=1Zi| =<br />

t<br />

i=1 (| ∪ (Zi)| − 1) + eE(F) = |V | − |F| + eE(F), as required.<br />

Corollary 5.5. The rank <strong>of</strong> the circuit matroid <strong>of</strong> a hypergraph H = (V, E) is |V | − 1 (i.e.<br />

H contains a tree-reducible sub-hypergraph) if <strong>and</strong> only if H is partition-connected.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. By definition rH(E) ≤ |V | − 1 <strong>and</strong> it follows from (5.2) that equality holds precisely<br />

if |V | − |F| + eH(F) ≥ |V | − 1 holds for every partition F <strong>of</strong> V , that is, eH(F) ≥ |F| − 1,<br />

which in turn is equivalent to the partition-<strong>connectivity</strong> <strong>of</strong> H.<br />

5.2.3 Decomposition into partition-connected sub-<strong>hypergraphs</strong><br />

By Corollary 5.5, a hypergraph can be decomposed into k partition-connected sub-hyper-<br />

graphs if <strong>and</strong> only if it contains k edge-disjoint tree-reducible sub-<strong>hypergraphs</strong>. This can<br />

also be described as a matroid problem. For a positive integer k let MkH denote the sum<br />

<strong>of</strong> k copies <strong>of</strong> the matroid MH, as defined in Theorem 2.7 <strong>of</strong> Edmonds. This matroid is<br />

defined on the set <strong>of</strong> hyperedges <strong>and</strong> a subset <strong>of</strong> hyperedges is independent if it can be<br />

decomposed into k wooded sub-<strong>hypergraphs</strong>.<br />

Theorem 5.6. The rank-function rkH <strong>of</strong> the matroid MkH is given by the following for-<br />

mula:<br />

rkH(X ) = min{k(|V | − |F|) + eX (F) : F is a partition <strong>of</strong> V }. (5.4)<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. Again, it suffices to prove the formula for the special case X = E. Also, as Theorem<br />

5.4 contained the special case k = 1, we may assume that k ≥ 2. As an independent set <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!