23.08.2013 Views

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Comparing the Killing Fields: Rwanda, Cambodia and Bosnia<br />

The overwhelmingly ideological motives behind the Cambodian bloodbath,<br />

together with the fact that the majority of the victims were Khmers,<br />

are sometimes invoked as justifi cation for the use of “politicide”, or “autogenocide”,<br />

as distinct from “genocide”, yet it is equally clear that entire<br />

ethno-religious communities were also targeted for physical annihilation<br />

(a point to which we shall return). And while some would insist that “ethnic<br />

cleansing” 3 is the most appropriate label to describe the slaughter of<br />

Bosnian Muslims – involving the planned and deliberate “removal” of<br />

populations deemed undesirable from certain territories, rather than the<br />

intent to eliminate a specifi c ethnic community as such – there are legitimate<br />

reasons for dissenting. We are in substantial agreement with Michael<br />

Sells that in Bosnia the aim was “to destroy both Bosnian Muslim culture<br />

and Bosnian multi-religious culture and to destroy the Bosnian Muslims<br />

as a group”. 4 So also in Rwanda, where the purpose of the génocidaires<br />

was to annihilate the Tutsi as a group, and in Cambodia, where specifi c<br />

ethno-religious communities, along with anyone suspected of being an<br />

“enemy of the revolution”, were systematically wiped out. We take the<br />

strongest exception, therefore, to the views expressed by Alain Destexhe<br />

that neither Cambodia nor Bosnia qualify as genocide because in neither<br />

case can it be said that the perpetrators intended to exterminate a whole<br />

people or tribe. 5<br />

Furthermore, the mass murders committed in Rwanda, Bosnia and Cambodia<br />

were planned, engineered and executed by the state. As has been argued<br />

time and again, genocide is preeminently a state crime. In short, the<br />

scale of the carnage, the character of the populations targeted for physical<br />

3 For a fuller discussion of the concept, see Andrew Bell-Fialkoff (1996), Ethnic Cleansing.<br />

New York, p. 1-4.<br />

4 Michael Sells (1996), The Bridge Betrayed: Religion and <strong>Genocide</strong> in Bosnia. Berkeley, p. 25.<br />

5 “It is clear“, writes Destexhe, “that the Khmer Rouge never intended the extermination of<br />

the Cambodian people, although their actions raised many questions about their ultimate<br />

objective“; as for the Serbs “they killed Muslims on a large scale because they were Muslims<br />

(the Croats were not singled out in the same way, at least not systematically) but their<br />

intention was to get rid of the Muslims not to exterminate them”. Alain Destexhe (1994),<br />

Rwanda and <strong>Genocide</strong> in the Twentieth Century. New York, p. 18, 19. For dissenting views, see<br />

Sells (1996) and Ben Kiernan (1999), “Sur la notion de génocide”, Le Débat no. 104, March-<br />

April, p. 179-92; Ben Kiernan (1996), The Pol Pot Regime. New Haven, p. 460; Ben Kiernan<br />

(1993), <strong>Genocide</strong> and Democracy in Cambodia. New Haven.<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!