23.08.2013 Views

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

Genocide: - DIIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Torben Jørgensen<br />

of the 1920s as had his protegé, the former chief of staff and Kemal’s successor<br />

as president of the republic, Ismet Inönü. 18<br />

Under the leadership of these men the powerful military infl uence on<br />

Turkish politics was established, an infl uence which to this day is still<br />

prevalent, and it is essentially the reason why the Turkish administrative<br />

system has retained the characteristic Turkish attitude towards minorities.<br />

An acknowledgement of genocide would imply an unthinkable criticism<br />

of the military and the bureaucracy for their role in the annihilation of the<br />

Armenians. Since 1923 the offi cial attitude to the Armenians has been that<br />

they have never had an independent state and are therefore not entitled<br />

to claim any territories in Anatolia, and during the 19th and early 20th<br />

century they were repeatedly disloyal, their disloyalty reaching its peak<br />

with the armed Armenian support given to the Russian troops in 1915. In<br />

that situation the Turkish government was forced to deport the Armenians<br />

from the zone of war. This was what Turkish historians decided to prove.<br />

It is still the offi cial view in Turkey.<br />

The most infl uential work from the early republic is without doubt Tarih<br />

(History) from 1931. 19 This work in four volumes was written by a number<br />

of the most outstanding Turkish historians of the period. It refl ects the ideology<br />

of the new Republic and the need to rewrite history. It was intended<br />

to assist in building up a new identity as Turks rather than Ottomans and<br />

to generate pride at the achievements of the Turkish people. It was an attempt<br />

to establish the claim that Anatolia is the territory the Turks originate<br />

from. Tarih became the point of departure in the professional historical<br />

education of a new generation of students and an essential infl uence on<br />

future historians. 20<br />

18 Enver had on several occasions pointed to Kemal as his successor. Lord Kinross (1964),<br />

Atatürk. The Rebirth of a Nation. London, p. 96. Ismet Inönü (1884-1973). Prime Minister<br />

1923-37, President 1938-50. From 1946 Inönü initiated the transition to parliamentary rule.<br />

He was the leader of the Republican Party 1938-72 and served as Prime Minister again<br />

between 1961-65.<br />

19 Tarih (1931), Ankara: Tyrkiye Maarif Vekaleti; Foss (1992), p. 8.<br />

20 Such an infl uence is decreasing today. But a few writers such as Frank Sümer defended<br />

an almost total sun-theory until the 1970s. Another connection is the relationship to the<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!